Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Breathtaking Corruption

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Breathtaking Corruption

    Nunes has already sent 8 criminal referrals to the Attorney General. Durham is wrapping up his investigation and we are starting to see the entire picture fill in. The future looks bleak for the swamp, which launched a complete HOAX. There was no Collusion, exculpatory evidence was illegally withheld during FISA abuse, a pattern of deep-state leaks and manufactured prosecutions of innocents, we have confirmation of a “DNC insurance policy” being set into place by corrupt deep state officials at the FBI, we now know the Russian Dossier was paid for by the DNC and used Putin-connected sources in an attempt to meddle in our elections. And then the corrupt deep-state swamp creatures at the DOJ (Obama embeds) used this garbage, which they knew was garbage, and knew was Russian meddling, to further perpetrate FISA abuse while accusing Trump of colluding with the meddlers (classic Marxist projection). With the intelligence agencies spying on Trump since day 1 (where do you think all the leaks to the WashPost/NYT come from?) its amazing Trump has beaten them soundly to date, and even more amazing what he is going to do next in rubbing their faces in the dirt (Brennan in jail).

    All of this breath-taking corruption involving numerous illegal acts such as conspiracy, leaking of classified information, wire fraud, collusion and espionage has to be compared with “Russian interference on behalf of Trump” found in the senate by intelligence committee never-Trumper establishment types (in the vein of McCain, Sessions, Prebus, etc.), based on $100K in facebook ads and some trolling by nameless, unprosecuted Russians (we just have to trust the Senate intelligence committee). Given that foreign nations buy ads in every election all over the world, its never been considered a problem before Trump, and nothing is ever said about it when globalists are doing it for Obama or Clinton, and given that US officials (Democrats, particularly Obama meddle in elections all the time (e.g. Israel’s election to oust B-Net), the fact that Libtards are pointing to that conclusion is absolutely laughable.

    The real conclusion is coming – just in time for the election. Already, the scope of the massive, unconstitutional and authoritarian fraud perpetrated on the American public is obvious to all with a brain. It will be soon also be obvious to those of you without one as well. Get ready. You are going to lose another election and then you are going to be humiliated beyond your wildest nightmares.

    #2
    6 months out, Biden tops Trump in latest national poll

    Without a third-party candidate, the national survey shows Biden topping Trump 50-40 percent.
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nov...ops-trump-poll

    Comment


      #3
      Top Republican: 'There won’t be a report' from John Durham

      “This is not going to be a Mueller report; there won’t be a report,” the Georgia Republican said, referring to former special counsel Robert Mueller's 448-page report. Collins said he believes the public will hear about the progress Durham has made when there is an indictment. “When he’s ready to charge people, he’ll charge people," Collins said. “And that’s when we’ll know.” Not everyone believes there will be any charges at all.
      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...om-john-durham

      No sane person expects the Durham report (if there is even a report at all) to overturn the findings from the Mueller investigation, the previous report from IG Horowitz, or the republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee. This charade was created so trump can claim his enemies are "under investigation". Sound familiar?

      There will be no charges. trump will drag this out as long as possible for propaganda purposes. Note that Durham has already "extended" the investigation to buy more time. If they had anything of substance they would have dropped indictments already.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        “This is not going to be a Mueller report; there won’t be a report,” the Georgia Republican said, referring to former special counsel Robert Mueller's 448-page report. Collins said he believes the public will hear about the progress Durham has made when there is an indictment. “When he’s ready to charge people, he’ll charge people," Collins said. “And that’s when we’ll know.” Not everyone believes there will be any charges at all.
        https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...om-john-durham

        No sane person expects the Durham report (if there is even a report at all) to overturn the findings from the Mueller investigation, the previous report from IG Horowitz, or the republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee. This charade was created so trump can claim his enemies are "under investigation". Sound familiar?

        There will be no charges. trump will drag this out as long as possible for propaganda purposes. Note that Durham has already "extended" the investigation to buy more time. If they had anything of substance they would have dropped indictments already.
        What’s wrong with dragging out an investigation? Hell, the Dems do it all the time. Buying more time? Maybe, or the bread crumb trails is longer than anyone expected. Time well tell.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          What’s wrong with dragging out an investigation? Hell, the Dems do it all the time. Buying more time? Maybe, or the bread crumb trails is longer than anyone expected. Time well tell.
          Nothing wrong with dragging it out, but it's a clear sign they have nothing. It would be in the republican's best interests to drop indictments as soon as possible. Durham says he's "broadening the scope" and "extending the timeline". Kind of like a desperate retailer saying he's extending the deadline on a sale due to "public demand". Durham needs more time to find something, anything, to please the boss.

          Another clear sign that Durham has nothing is AG Barr announcing his pre-determined conclusions while the probe is still underway. Any prosecutor who did this in a normal investigation would be disbarred. And even if the probe did turn up something, the defense would argue that opposing counsel contaminated the jury with a leak before the trial. Barr's move would be tantamount to legal malpractice if he actually expected to have a case. The leak is clearly meant to influence public opinion and feed talking points to the boss.

          When you're investigating and you actually have the goods, you keep quiet. Like Mueller did.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            What’s wrong with dragging out an investigation? Hell, the Dems do it all the time. Buying more time? Maybe, or the bread crumb trails is longer than anyone expected. Time well tell.
            lol the GOP dragged Benghazi out for four years, found nothing. HRC testified and fully cooperated also.

            Comment


              #7
              Speaking of corruption - one part of the bailouts didn't limit stock buybacks or CEO pay, or (worse) require them to preserve jobs. The Dems fought for that but lost because the GOP claimed their stall tactics hurt US workers. Try and square this corporate giveaway with food banks have hours long lines of desperate people.



              https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...ge%2Fstory-ans

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Nothing wrong with dragging it out, but it's a clear sign they have nothing. It would be in the republican's best interests to drop indictments as soon as possible. Durham says he's "broadening the scope" and "extending the timeline". Kind of like a desperate retailer saying he's extending the deadline on a sale due to "public demand". Durham needs more time to find something, anything, to please the boss.

                Another clear sign that Durham has nothing is AG Barr announcing his pre-determined conclusions while the probe is still underway. Any prosecutor who did this in a normal investigation would be disbarred. And even if the probe did turn up something, the defense would argue that opposing counsel contaminated the jury with a leak before the trial. Barr's move would be tantamount to legal malpractice if he actually expected to have a case. The leak is clearly meant to influence public opinion and feed talking points to the boss.

                When you're investigating and you actually have the goods, you keep quiet. Like Mueller did.
                Yeah, Mueller sure had the goods. How you ever considered your winning percentage with all your predictions? I mean seriously, every prediction from landslide victories, Russia, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo’s, bribery, obstruction, to removal from office has crashed and burned. Your like the boy who cried wolf. Nobody cares anymore. We will know, when we know.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  lol the GOP dragged Benghazi out for four years, found nothing. HRC testified and fully cooperated also.
                  We actually found out all we needed to know...”what difference does it make?” The 5 words that started her demise! 4 years well spent!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Yeah, Mueller sure had the goods. How you ever considered your winning percentage with all your predictions? I mean seriously, every prediction from landslide victories, Russia, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo’s, bribery, obstruction, to removal from office has crashed and burned. Your like the boy who cried wolf. Nobody cares anymore. We will know, when we know.
                    Read the report. You've got plenty of time now. Don't forget the "we can't indict a sitting president" stance by the AG and GOP either.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Read the report. You've got plenty of time now. Don't forget the "we can't indict a sitting president" stance by the AG and GOP either.
                      I’m hearing another prediction in there.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Today's Swamp Watch

                        From today's Swamp Watch - more breath taking corruption:

                        FBI discussed interviewing Michael Flynn 'to get him to lie' and 'get him fired,' handwritten notes show
                        https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mic...-him-lie-fired

                        Classic Swamp. While the Trump haters on The View have proclaimed "Thank God for the Swamp", the rest of America is disgusted. Disgusted with Libtards but also never-Trumpers, many of whom still serve in elected office (we havent gotten rid of them all, just yet - its a process).

                        The entire "Russia Meddled" narrative is bogus, taking something that happens every election and opportunistically using it to support a false narrative.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          AG William Barr on the Russia investigation: 'There's something far more troubling here'
                          https://www.foxnews.com/media/ag-wil...troubling-here

                          "My own view is that the evidence shows that we're not dealing with just the mistakes or sloppiness,"

                          Just the beginning folks.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Trump-connected firms received large loans through small business coronavirus-relief

                            The government's $349 billion small business lending program (Paycheck Protection Program, "PPP") was designed to keep merchants afloat during the COVID-19 crisis. The program quickly ran out of money as large publicly traded companies with thousands of employees scooped up millions, leaving the real small businesses struggling to stay open.

                            In the past week, we've learned more about the companies that obtained these low-interest, taxpayer-backed loans. It appears that a key to success is to (1) have ties to the Trump administration, and/or (2) already have lots of money.

                            The top recipient nationwide of coronavirus relief aid is an investment firm that hired a pair of D.C. lobbying firms stacked with Trump fundraisers and White House alumni. Ashford Inc., an asset management firm based in Dallas, has collected $53 million from the small business loan program.
                            https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/22/b...te-trusts.html

                            Ashford hired its first-ever Washington lobbying firm, Miller Strategies. That firm is run by Jeff Miller, who was a finance vice-chair of President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee. He has raised more than $2.8 million for the RNC and a Trump joint fundraising committee so far this cycle, including $2.5 million in the first quarter of 2020 alone…

                            On the same day that Ashford hired Miller, it inked a separate lobbying deal with another Trump-connected firm. Bailey Strategic Advisors is run by Roy Bailey, a Trump fundraiser who served as finance chair of pro-Trump super PAC America First Action and on the board of an affiliated dark money group, America First Policies.
                            https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-to...aid?ref=author

                            Ashford’s chairman, Monty Bennett, has “given over $200,000 to the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, and a joint fundraising committee supporting both of them since last year. He chipped in even more in support of Trump’s 2016 campaign.”

                            Gordon Sondland, Trump's former ambassador to the E.U., was a beneficiary of the small-business relief package
                            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...usiness-relief

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Trump is enriching himself and his donors at taxpayer expense

                              An analysis by NBC News found three companies with ties to the Trump administration received a total of $18.3 million under the program.

                              Hallador Energy, a coal company, snagged $10 million under the program. Last year, Hallador hired former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to lobby on its behalf. “Hallador also shares a director in common with another loan recipient, Ramaco Resources… [which] received $8.4 million” despite the company’s valuation of at least $100 million.

                              Energy services company Flotek Industries received a $4.6 million loan. Trump’s current acting director of national intelligence and ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, worked as a consultant for Flotek.

                              MiMedx Group, a maker of skin grafts, received $10 million. MiMedx's former chief executive, Parker H. Petit, was Trump's finance chairman in Georgia in 2016. Both the company and Petit are in trouble with the Justice Department. Just three weeks ago, MiMedx agreed to pay $6.5 million to settle DOJ accusations it had overcharged hospitals run by the VA. Petit is under indictment for securities fraud and awaiting trial.

                              https://www.nbcnews.com/business/eco...l_nbn_20200424

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X