Oakwood turned away by the ECNL AGAIN

[Unregistered]

That is because 2004 is too late to move. No where else to go unless you are an absolute game changer.

Agreed. And no one from that group is a game changer.

[Unregistered]

They had a chance to go ECNL but ECNL demanded both a boys AND girls team. OW didn't want an ECNL boys team so they declined.

OW boys don't like the movie Frozen, playing dress up and wearing make-up so OW knew it would never work having their boys play in the ECNL.

In the end, all that they care about is the boys program anyway and as much as theyd like a girls ECNL, no way would they trade the boys for that.

[Unregistered]

They had a chance to go ECNL but ECNL demanded both a boys AND girls team. OW didn't want an ECNL boys team so they declined.

OW boys don't like the movie Frozen, playing dress up and wearing make-up so OW knew it would never work having their boys play in the ECNL.

Heard the opposite. That the boys were invited and they wanted the girls in, but ECNL rejected them girls so OW said no thanks. Which one is it?

[Unregistered]

In the end, all that they care about is the boys program anyway and as much as theyd like a girls ECNL, no way would they trade the boys for that.

Agreed. i think its good to have a girl centric club like CFC and boy centric like OW. It lets them specialize in the needs of each.

[Unregistered]

Heard the opposite. That the boys were invited and they wanted the girls in, but ECNL rejected them girls so OW said no thanks. Which one is it?

But why on earth would they have wanted their boys program in the ECNL? That is a trade they'd never entertain.

[Unregistered]

But why on earth would they have wanted their boys program in the ECNL? That is a trade they'd never entertain.

They were invited

[Unregistered]

So why are we hearing that Oakwood wanted to join DPL instead of EDP? They wanted ECNL got rejected, then rejected from DPL and now lowest level EDP.

Ouch, they were rejected from DPL too?

[Unregistered]

Heard the opposite. That the boys were invited and they wanted the girls in, but ECNL rejected them girls so OW said no thanks. Which one is it?

Semantics. ECNL wanted boys but not girls so OW didn't go ECNL. We are both saying the same thing.

[Unregistered]

Semantics. ECNL wanted boys but not girls so OW didn't go ECNL. We are both saying the same thing.

Girls are NPL second-teamers at best. No business in ECNL. Besides, CT already has FSA and CFC in the ECNL basement, so no need to dig deeper.