Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

trump now pushing "Obamagate" conspiracy; can't say what that actually is

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    First the WaPo now Yahoo. It seems more and more news outlets are waking up to the idea of Obama administration corruption. We’re not in Fox News land anymore.

    https://news.yahoo.com/obamagate-not...214627867.html

    Democrats and their allies, who like to pretend that President Obama’s only scandalous act was wearing a tan suit, are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against Obama. But the fact is that we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the Russian-collusion investigation.

    We know the DOJ withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump’s orbit. We have proof that many of the relevant FISA-warrant applications — almost every one of them, actually — were based on “fabricated” evidence or riddled with errors. We know that members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump’s allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn into a guilty plea so it could keep the investigation going.

    What’s more, the larger context only makes all of these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration’s intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files. His attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.” And though it’s been long forgotten, Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Hey trumptard, we're still waiting for you to explain all those disturbing trump-Russia connections. Start with trump's comments in Helsinki, please.
      The Russian Troll will never explain, because it can't be explained any other way. trump is compromised by the Russians.

      All the Troll can do is repeat himself endlessly, like a short-circuited Star Wars droid, that there is no smoking gun evidence. That's what he's programmed by his handlers to do.

      Nobody ever said there was smoking gun evidence. But The Truth is out there, as anyone with a fully functioning brain can see. Putin has trump's balls in his pocket. The sooner we get this traitorous loser out of office the better.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        The Russian Troll will never explain, because it can't be explained any other way. trump is compromised by the Russians.

        All the Troll can do is repeat himself endlessly, like a short-circuited Star Wars droid, that there is no smoking gun evidence. That's what he's programmed by his handlers to do.

        Nobody ever said there was smoking gun evidence. But The Truth is out there, as anyone with a fully functioning brain can see. Putin has trump's balls in his pocket. The sooner we get this traitorous loser out of office the better.
        Signed,
        Compromised China Joe Biden

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          The Russian Troll will never explain, because it can't be explained any other way. trump is compromised by the Russians.

          All the Troll can do is repeat himself endlessly, like a short-circuited Star Wars droid, that there is no smoking gun evidence. That's what he's programmed by his handlers to do.

          Nobody ever said there was smoking gun evidence. But The Truth is out there, as anyone with a fully functioning brain can see. Putin has trump's balls in his pocket. The sooner we get this traitorous loser out of office the better.
          The single best evidence that trump is compromised by Russia is his speech in Helsinki. His cowering subservience to the former KGB chief who is now president of the nation that is America's most dangerous adversary.

          You can use tortured logic and self-delusion to dismiss 57 pieces of circumstantial evidence, but you can't dismiss Helsinki. trump is owned by Putin. History will show the truth.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            The single best evidence that trump is compromised by Russia is his speech in Helsinki. His cowering subservience to the former KGB chief who is now president of the nation that is America's most dangerous adversary.

            You can use tortured logic and self-delusion to dismiss 57 pieces of circumstantial evidence, but you can't dismiss Helsinki. trump is owned by Putin. History will show the truth.
            Sounds like you got him. Did you send this up the chain to Brennen, Clapper, Rice, *****, Rhodes, McCabe, Yates, Powers, and Comey? I think they would appreciate your “concerns and pauses” in this matter since they hit a dead end in their 4 year investigation. Just include “gut feeling” in the subject matter. 😂

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Sounds like you got him. Did you send this up the chain to Brennen, Clapper, Rice, *****, Rhodes, McCabe, Yates, Powers, and Comey? I think they would appreciate your “concerns and pauses” in this matter since they hit a dead end in their 4 year investigation. Just include “gut feeling” in the subject matter. 😂
              Explain Helsinki, please.

              Here the video, in case you need a refresher:
              https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nference-video

              Putin's "strong and powerful denial" made trump cower before his master like a beaten dog. Probably at least 3 diaper changes that day.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Explain Helsinki, please.

                Here the video, in case you need a refresher:
                https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nference-video

                Putin's "strong and powerful denial" made trump cower before his master like a beaten dog. Probably at least 3 diaper changes that day.
                Watch trump's and Putin's reaction when the reporter asks if Russia has any compromising material on trump or his family (1:46)

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Explain Helsinki, please.

                  Here the video, in case you need a refresher:
                  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nference-video

                  Putin's "strong and powerful denial" made trump cower before his master like a beaten dog. Probably at least 3 diaper changes that day.
                  Intelligence evidence please! Stop teasing us.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Mounting evidence suggests the Obama administration engaged in serious corruption with ObamaGate. Democrats and their media allies are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against President Barack Obama. But fact is, we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the “collusion” investigation.

                    It isn’t conspiracy-mongering to note that the investigation into President Trump was predicated on an opposition-research document filled with fabulism and, most likely, Russian disinformation. We know the Department of Justice withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump’s orbit.

                    We have proof that many of the relevant warrant applications were based on “fabricated” evidence or riddled with errors. We know that members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump’s allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn.

                    The larger context only makes these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration’s intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files.

                    His attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.”

                    Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of Iran-deal opponents in Congress.

                    What makes anyone believe these people wouldn’t create a pretext to spy on the opposition party? If anyone does, they shouldn’t, because, on top of everything else, we know that Barack Obama was keenly interested in the Russian-collusion investigation’s progress.

                    In her very last hour in office, National Security Adviser Susan Rice wrote a self-preserving e-mail to herself, noting that she’d attended a meeting with the president, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey and Vice President Joe Biden in which Obama stressed that everything in the investigation should proceed “by the book.”

                    Did high-ranking Obama administration officials not always conduct such investigations “by the book”? It is curious that they would need to be specifically instructed to do so. It is also curious that the outgoing national security adviser would need to mention this meeting — 15 minutes after Trump had been sworn in.

                    SEE ALSO

                    Trump: Obama 'knew everything' about Russia probe, should testify
                    None of this means that Obama committed some specific, easily defined crime; he almost assuredly didn’t. His staff is another story. In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity.

                    This all matters, because, for one thing, many of the same characters central to all this apparent malfeasance now want to retake power in Washington. Biden is the Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential nominee. He’s running as the heir to Obama’s legacy, and he was at that meeting with Rice. He had denied even knowing anything about the FBI investigation into Flynn before being forced to correct himself after ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pointed out that he was mentioned in Rice’s e-mail. It’s completely legitimate to wonder what he knew about the investigation.

                    Skeptics like to point out that the Obama administration had no motive to engage in abuse because Democrats were sure they were going to win. Richard Nixon won 49 states in 1972. His cronies had no need to break into the Democratic National Committee’s offices.

                    Likewise in 2016. As the FBI agents involved in the case noted, they wanted to have an “insurance policy” if the unthinkable happened. And indeed, the unthinkable did happen, and we’re still dealing with the fallout four years later. We don’t know where this scandal will end up, but one doesn’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to wonder.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Mounting evidence suggests the Obama administration engaged in serious corruption with ObamaGate.

                      [...rest of unattributed copied/pasted article deleted to avoid copyright lawsuit...]
                      I didn't know shameless plagiarism of right-wing authors was in the Russian Troll handbook.
                      https://www.gazettextra.com/opinion/...97cc2fc72.html

                      But I see why you didn't want anyone to know the source. David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist

                      "Overall, we rate The Federalist a borderline Questionable and far Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion pseudoscience and three failed fact checks"
                      https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        I didn't know shameless plagiarism of right-wing authors was in the Russian Troll handbook.
                        https://www.gazettextra.com/opinion/...97cc2fc72.html

                        But I see why you didn't want anyone to know the source. David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist

                        "Overall, we rate The Federalist a borderline Questionable and far Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion pseudoscience and three failed fact checks"
                        https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/
                        The Russian Troll had to dig deep to find a nutcase alt-right journalist willing to promote this retarded Obamagate conspiracy.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Wait... isn’t Obamagate the scandal where Mitch McConnell claimed Obama didn’t set up a pandemic playbook when he totally had? ...and then had to apologize for being a lying toad about it?
                          https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...andemic-259969

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Wait... isn’t Obamagate the scandal where Mitch McConnell claimed Obama didn’t set up a pandemic playbook when he totally had? ...and then had to apologize for being a lying toad about it?
                            https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...andemic-259969
                            yes, yes it is

                            Comment

                            Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                            Auto-Saved
                            x
                            Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                            x
                            Working...
                            X