Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Overseas, the great clubs consolidate the athletes and they're all playing with and against one another. They can differentiate which ones have the gifts, the collective talent, and which do not. The theory that the US can't compete in world soccer with the elite because our best athletes play other sports is poppycock. The problem is our pay-to-play system doesn't encourage our system to consolidate the talent until they're U16 and above, and by then many kids have just come to accept their lot in life. No one is truly out there finding the best soccer players regardless of their socioeconomic setting because everyone is in it for the money, and there is nothing gained for programs, clubs, or coaches of promoting a top shelf player because the only thing that will happen is once that player gets noticed he is gone, no longer paying club dues, or helping club teams and coaches pad their resumes. They get no compensation, or consideration for making that kid great....so many, many times players go unnoticed. Because of this coaches and US Soccer struggle to find the right elite player like they do overseas that has the perfect blend of athleticism with soccer IQ, and skill. They resort to using measurements and athleticism as a way to separate and decide...like you said assuming they can teach the soccer. Soccer intelligence is almost impossible to teach after kids turn 16.....they either have that innate soccer IQ, or they do not, you can make up a little for it with athleticism and size, but it's not going to make the US a truly great soccer program.
Comment