Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
-
no, no, no...you supported this party. Time to own it. You didn't want Trump and this is what you gave us. So what happens when somebody "slips up" and uses these disgusting words like Mom, Dad, Son, and Daughter. Oh the horror. Yeah, Trump is destroying America alright. We had to cancel Thankgiving, Christmas, New Years, Church, Sports, Schools and Concerts. Now they don't want to say Mother and Father. Face it, you idiots played right into their hands. The Dems told you they will fundamentally change this country and you didn't listen. I can't wait for the next 4 years. This will be fun to watch! -
“These future-focused proposals reflect our priorities as a Caucus and as a Country,” the House Speaker added. - Nancy PelsoiOriginally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
This guy keeps answering and adding to this thread, so sad. I will make this my only post so I don't ruin your vibe in this thread.
lol...LoserComment
-
-
So it begins!
Welcome to Socialist America folks. That didn't take long. I thought they would have waited until Stammering Joe got into to office. Are we really shocked? You knew it was coming. Mandatory masks, mandatory lockdown, mandatory, school closures, mandatory small business closure, and now the possibility of mandatory vaccines to "freely" move around the country and get educated. Boy oh boy is Trump is destroying this country! ;)
https://www.theblaze.com/news/fauci-...virus-passport
Dr. Fauci says mandatory COVID-19 vaccines possible for schools and travel
Fauci noted that the mandatory coronavirus vaccinations would likely be implemented at the state and city level.
"A citywide school system might require it in some cities but not other cities. And that's what I mean by things not being done centrally but locally," the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases told Newsweek.
When asked about the possibility of coronavirus vaccine passports and mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations, Fauci said, "Everything will be on the table for discussion."
Dr. Fauci admitted that the United States federal government could get involved by issuing COVID-19 vaccine passports. The coronavirus immunity passport would allow those who have been vaccinated to move more freely globally without being tested for coronavirus.
Fauci also said he "would not be surprised" if some companies, hospitals, and organizations required the COVID-19 vaccine.
Fauci acknowledged that he does not have the authority to enact potential mandatory COVID-19 vaccines, "It's not up to me to make a decision. But these are all things that will be discussed [under the Biden administration]."Comment
-
More Liberal Hypocrisy
How many times are "Liberal Leaders" gonna prove to the world they're full of BS? Whether they're attending swanky dinner parties, traveling to tropical vacations, or dancing in the middle of NYC during lock downs, they have no problems telling the rest of us to sit down and shut up while lecturing what's best for us. Make no mistake, they're just in it for themselves. I thought quarantine guidelines were put in place to protect us all. Oh my bad, Nancy is trying to get re-elected. She is making Covid positive members break quarantine to appear in person to vote for her. Boy oh boy, she really cares about all of us!
https://www.breitbart.com/health/202...-another-term/
‘Super Spreader’ Speakership Election: Nancy Pelosi Allows Democrats to Break Quarantine to Help Secure Another Term
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is turning the House of Representatives into a potential coronavirus hotspot, allowing Democrats to break quarantine to vote in the speakership election as she faces a tough battle for another term atop the chamber
At least three members, according to congressional reporter John Bresnahan, are breaking quarantine to attend swearing-in ceremonies and the all-important speakership election Sunday. Two of them are Democrats, he revealed, and one is a Republican. In addition to those three comes Rep. Gwen Moore (D-FL), attending the vote to back Pelosi after testing positive for the deadly virus just six days ago.
“Nancy Pelosi’s grip on the speakership is so tenuous that she is forcing members exposed to coronavirus to break quarantine and come to the Capitol to vote for her and protect her political power,” the senior GOP aide told Breitbart News.Comment
-
He should take a listen to Trump's phone call trying to get the GA secretary of state to find him more votes. Pressuring a government official to change the outcome of an election is criminal and certifiableOriginally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Dems wear masks. GOP doesn't. Ask the family of the LA rep who died of Covid days before being sworn in. Or the head of MA GOP who got covid at a White House holiday party. Or the head of the NH GOP who died from it. Or Herman Cain. Or Trump.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
-
Masks are supposed to prevent Covid. The fact she made already infected members break quarantine and show up in person just to vote for her is the most irresponsible thing anyone could do. Goes to show she cares more about her Speaker spot than her members. After this stunt, liberals just forfeited their rights to lecture anybody on Covid responsibility. I swear you libtards bathe in hypocrisy! Can u imagine if Trump did this?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
Are they required to travel, eat at restaurants, or go to sporting events? Get ready, you know it’s coming. It’s what the Socialist Liberals want. You’ll see.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
More Liberal Wokeness
In the Liberals never ending effort to be woke, they are showing what complete and utter morons they really are. You can’t make this stuff up. Man, these next 4 years are gonna be a blast! Hey dipshîts “Amen” is not a gender word. But leave up to Libtards to make it one.
https://amp.dailycaller.com/2021/01/...ed-amen-awoman
Prayer To Open The 117th Congress Ended With ‘Amen And Awoman’
Democratic Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver ended his prayer to open up the 117th Congress on Sunday with the words “amen and awoman.”
Video of the prayer’s ending was posted to Twitter by Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, who pointed out that the word “amen” is Latin for “so be it.”
“It’s not a gendered word,” Reschenthaler wrote. “Unfortunately, facts are irrelevant to progressives. Unbelievable.”
“We ask it in the name of the monotheistic God, [unintelligible], and God known by many names and by many different faiths, amen, and awoman,” said Cleaver, an ordained United Methodist pastor.Comment
-
Socailist America
For all the Libtards who think Republicans are a bunch of conspiracy theorists, take a look at the New York State Senate official webpage. Read closely and tell me again how our freedoms are not being jeopardized by these liberal idiots. They're talking about detention camps for US citizens. It's amazing to me that Dems have no problems with Pelosi mandating sick members to break quarantine for her election but want to detain the rest of us. Gee, no public health risk there. I would encourage you to read the whole act in its entirety. This should scare the hell out of all of us. Well done Dems, well done!
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2017/A680
§ 2120-A. REMOVAL AND DETENTION OF CASES, CONTACTS AND CARRIERS WHO
ARE OR MAY BE A DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH; OTHER ORDERS. 1. THE PROVISIONS
OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE UTILIZED IN THE EVENT THAT THE GOVERNOR
DECLARES A STATE OF HEALTH EMERGENCY DUE TO AN EPIDEMIC OF ANY COMMUNI-
CABLE DISEASE.
2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH
OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR
SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE
OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY
POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING
IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE-
GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF
LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH
A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN-
TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC
DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR
GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO-
PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER
DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.
3. A PERSON OR GROUP REMOVED OR DETAINED BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR OR
HIS OR HER DELEGEE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE
DETAINED FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IN SUCH MANNER AS THE DEPARTMENT MAY DIRECT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION.
6. WHEN A PERSON OR GROUP IS ORDERED TO BE DETAINED PURSUANT TO SUBDI-
VISION TWO OF THIS SECTION FOR A PERIOD NOT EXCEEDING THREE BUSINESS
DAYS, SUCH PERSON OR MEMBER OF SUCH GROUP SHALL, UPON REQUEST, BE
AFFORDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. IF A PERSON OR GROUP DETAINED
PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION NEEDS TO BE DETAINED BEYOND
THREE BUSINESS DAYS, THEY SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN ADDITIONAL COMMIS-
SIONER'S ORDER PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISIONS TWO AND EIGHT OF THIS SECTION.
7. WHEN A PERSON OR GROUP IS ORDERED TO BE DETAINED PURSUANT TO SUBDI-
VISION TWO OF THIS SECTION FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING THREE BUSINESS DAYS,
AND SUCH PERSON OR MEMBER OF SUCH GROUP REQUESTS RELEASE, THE GOVERNOR
OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE SHALL MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR A COURT ORDER
AUTHORIZING SUCH DETENTION WITHIN THREE BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUCH REQUEST
BY THE END OF THE FIRST BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING SUCH SATURDAY, SUNDAY, OR
LEGAL HOLIDAY, WHICH APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A REQUEST FOR AN EXPE-
DITED HEARING. AFTER ANY SUCH REQUEST FOR RELEASE, DETENTION SHALL NOT
CONTINUE FOR MORE THAN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS IN THE ABSENCE OF A COURT
ORDER AUTHORIZING DETENTION. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS,
IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY PERSON BE DETAINED FOR MORE THAN SIXTY DAYS WITH-
OUT A COURT ORDER AUTHORIZING SUCH DETENTION. THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER
DELEGEE SHALL SEEK FURTHER COURT REVIEW OF SUCH DETENTION WITHIN NINETY
DAYS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL COURT ORDER AUTHORIZING DETENTION AND THERE-
AFTER WITHIN NINETY DAYS OF EACH SUBSEQUENT COURT REVIEW. IN ANY COURT
PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE AN ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE FOR
(V) A NOTICE ADVISING THE PERSON OR GROUP BEING DETAINED THAT THEY
HAVE A RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY LEGAL COUNSEL AND THAT UPON REQUEST OF
SUCH PERSON OR GROUP ACCESS TO COUNSEL WILL BE FACILITATED TO THE EXTENT
FEASIBLE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES; AND
(VI) A NOTICE ADVISING THE PERSON OR GROUP BEING DETAINED THAT THEY
MAY SUPPLY THE ADDRESSES AND/OR TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF FRIENDS AND/OR
RELATIVES TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF THE PERSON'S DETENTION, AND THAT
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL, AT THE DETAINED PERSON'S REQUEST AND TO THE EXTENT
FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NOTICE TO A REASONABLE NUMBER OF SUCH PEOPLE THAT THE
PERSON IS BEING DETAINED.Comment
-
More scary information released today. Where is Dustin Hoffman when you need him?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...e-coronavirus/
A bill working its way through the New York State Assembly would give Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) the authority to order the “Removal and detention of cases, contacts and carriers who are or may be a danger to public health.”
So not only would the governor have the power to violate your privacy by announcing you’re a public health risk, we’re talking about having you detained and imprisoned for up to 60 days without any kind of due process. That’s right, it’s only after 60 days that this law requires court authorization to imprison you: “in no event shall any person be detained for more than sixty days without a court order authorizing such detention.”
So the government fingers you as a threat to public health, scoops you off the street (or out of your home or place of business), and off you go to some public health facility or “premises” — which is just a fancy term for prison, or a place where you might not be able to earn a living, or pay your bills, or be with friends and family. And this is allowed for two whole months before any sort of due process is required…
The bill does not specifically mention the coronavirus. It broadens the governor’s police powers “to any communicable disease” for which the “the governor declares a state of health emergency.”
The bill doesn’t even mention a “deadly disease,” only “communicable,” which could include STDs or the flu.
Hell, you don’t even have to be sick to be picked up and imprisoned by the Health Stasi. “Removal and detention of cases, contacts and carriers…” or merely a “suspected case.”Comment
-
Hey Liberals please explain to me how you would feel if your child was vaccinated without your knowledge or consent. This bill was written for the sole purpose of overriding parents right to make decisions for their children. They are putting the decision on 11 year olds. This is insanity! In your blind hatred for the POTUS, you were willing to do whatever it took to get him out of there despite who would step in. Well here it is. First proposals for detention camps now this. Well done. I don’t who more stupid, the people who write these bills or the people who vote them in. Welcome to Liberal Socialist America!
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/943205
Washington, DC, has approved legislation that allows minors as young as 11 to consent to vaccination without their parents' knowledge — if a physician determines the child is capable of giving informed consent.
It also prohibits insurers from sending an explanation of benefits to the parents, and it requires a physician to submit the immunization record directly to the minor's school "if the parent is utilizing a religious exemption
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...outputType=amp
A bill passed by the D.C. Council on Tuesday would allow children as young as age 11 to obtain vaccinations without their parents’ consent.
Under the legislation, if a doctor determines that a minor is capable of informed consent, they would be able to seek government-recommended vaccinations their parents object to on religious grounds.
The bill, which was approved 12 to 1, requires that the doctor send the vaccination record in such cases to the child’s school, rather than to the parents, and seek compensation directly from the insurance company without involving the parents.Comment
Comment