Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ct Celtic FC

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    From Glen to Glen

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Connecticut Online Harassment Attorneys


    Law Firm For Social Networking, Cyber Slander, and Internet Defamation Lawsuits in Connecticut and Massachusetts


    Social networking is one of the biggest growing technology platforms in the world. With the explosive growth in use and popularity, there have been numerous social networking lawsuits involving sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace and Twitter.

    As technology changes, so do we. At Raymond Law Group LLC, our Connecticut online harassment attorneys are up to date on the most widely used legal theories for claims involving lawsuits and Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. We are available to help clients in Connecticut and Massachusetts who have questions on legal options concerning social networking and the Internet. Contact us at 860-633-0580 to see how if we can help you.

    LinkedIn, Twitter, MySpace, and Facebook Lawsuits in Connecticut
    Many businesses and their employees use Web sites such as LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace and Twitter to advertise, communicate with one another, share information and establish a network of contacts. Unfortunately, many times social networking sites are improperly used and a lawsuit can result from such things as Facebook wall postings, Twitter posts, LinkedIn status updates and client connections.

    Every business needs to have a social networking policy in place for employee use of social networking sites, such as Facebook or LinkedIn. The number of lawsuits related to social networking is rapidly increasing related to employee rights, privacy rights, defamation, breach of confidentiality and commercial disparagement. We can help you develop a social media policy at the workplace and for such matters as electronic monitoring and internet usage.

    One of the most unnerving developments with social media sites, such as Facebook, YouTube and MySpace, relates to an upward trend of cyber bullying, harassment, and invasion of privacy including cases connected to devastating suicides and other injuries. People of all ages, including middle and high school students, college students, and adults have faced incidents of intimidation, defamation, or harassment on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace. If this is happening to you related to work or school, you should consult an attorney to help stop the bullying, harassment, and defamation.

    Raymond Law Group LLC recently was asked by the media about lawsuits from Facebook and other social networking sites.

    Our attorneys can help you if you have questions regarding social networking, Web sites, the Internet and the following issues:
    •Defamation and slander
    •Cyber bullying, harassment
    •Privacy rights and Invasion of Privacy
    •Security concerns
    •Employment issues
    •Social networking, Social media policies
    •Trade secret disclosure
    •Information theft

    • Cyber liability


    Contact Our Hartford Invasion of Privacy Lawyers

    They can advise you as to the benefits and liabilities of using social networking. Contact us to set up an appointment so our technology lawyers can answer any questions you may have about social networking, defamation and the Internet.
    Definitions and description

    See also: Doxing and Cyberbullying

    There have been a number of attempts by experts and legislators to define cyberstalking. It is generally understood to be the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group, or an organization.[1] Cyberstalking is a form of cyberbullying, and the terms are often used interchangeably in the media. Both may include false accusations, defamation, slander and libel. Cyberstalking may also include monitoring, identity theft, threats, vandalism, solicitation for sex, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass. Cyberstalking is often accompanied by real-time or offline stalking.[2] Both are criminal offenses.[3]

    Stalking is a continuous process, consisting of a series of actions, each of which may be entirely legal in itself. Technology ethics professor Lambèr Royakkers defines cyberstalking as perpetrated by someone without a current relationship with the victim. About the abusive effects of cyberstalking, he writes that:


    [Stalking] is a form of mental assault, in which the perpetrator repeatedly, unwantedly, and disruptively breaks into the life-world of the victim, with whom he has no relationship (or no longer has), with motives that are directly or indirectly traceable to the affective sphere. Moreover, the separated acts that make up the intrusion cannot by themselves cause the mental abuse, but do taken together (cumulative effect).[5]

    Comment


      From Glen to Glen

      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      I feel bad for your daughter doesn't look like she will grow much anymore. Have you seen how tall you are RL? Your such a dirt bag that the best thing you can do for your daughter is not be involved in her life. Your gonna ruin her life like your doing to yours.
      A review of Cyberstalking laws in Connecticut

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6mNK3OvNAc

      Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181c. Stalking in the first degree: Class D felony. (2012)

      (a) A person is guilty of stalking in the first degree when such person commits stalking in the second degree as provided in section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, and (1) such person has previously been convicted of a violation of section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, or (2) such conduct violates a court order in effect at the time of the offense, or (3) the other person is under sixteen years of age.

      (b) Stalking in the first degree is a class D felony.

      Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181d. Stalking in the second degree: Class A misdemeanor. (2012)

      (a) For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which a person directly, indirectly or through a third party, by any action, method, device or means,

      (1) follows, lies in wait for, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, communicates with or sends unwanted gifts to, a person, or

      (2) interferes with a person's property.

      (b) A person is guilty of stalking in the second degree when:


      (1) Such person knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person's physical safety or the physical safety of a third person; or


      (2) Such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear that such person's employment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact at such other person's place of employment or business, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity.

      (c) Stalking in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

      Comment


        Talking - Stalker

        [QUOTE=Unregistered;1959779]
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

        RL lives in a two family piece of crap. Use to drive a piece of crap beat up Saturn until he used some of that stolen money to move on up to a Toyota. His coaching skills please . When's the last time RL has won a tournament or division ? Crickets . Smallest man alive , he could fit into a carry on luggage if needed to. Wonder why the ***** ain't married . I get it no woman wants to take care of another child . Talk to me when you can grow to be at my level .
        Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181c. Stalking in the first degree: Class D felony. (2012)

        (a) A person is guilty of stalking in the first degree when such person commits stalking in the second degree as provided in section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, and (1) such person has previously been convicted of a violation of section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, or (2) such conduct violates a court order in effect at the time of the offense, or (3) the other person is under sixteen years of age.

        (b) Stalking in the first degree is a class D felony.

        Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181d. Stalking in the second degree: Class A misdemeanor. (2012)

        (a) For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which a person directly, indirectly or through a third party, by any action, method, device or means,

        (1) follows, lies in wait for, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, communicates with or sends unwanted gifts to, a person, or

        (2) interferes with a person's property.

        (b) A person is guilty of stalking in the second degree when:


        (1) Such person knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person's physical safety or the physical safety of a third person; or


        (2) Such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear that such person's employment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact at such other person's place of employment or business, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity.

        (c) Stalking in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

        Comment


          [QUOTE=Unregistered;2057234]
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

          Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181c. Stalking in the first degree: Class D felony. (2012)

          (a) A person is guilty of stalking in the first degree when such person commits stalking in the second degree as provided in section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, and (1) such person has previously been convicted of a violation of section 53a-181d, as amended by this act, or (2) such conduct violates a court order in effect at the time of the offense, or (3) the other person is under sixteen years of age.

          (b) Stalking in the first degree is a class D felony.

          Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-181d. Stalking in the second degree: Class A misdemeanor. (2012)

          (a) For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which a person directly, indirectly or through a third party, by any action, method, device or means,

          (1) follows, lies in wait for, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, communicates with or sends unwanted gifts to, a person, or

          (2) interferes with a person's property.

          (b) A person is guilty of stalking in the second degree when:


          (1) Such person knowingly engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear for such person's physical safety or the physical safety of a third person; or


          (2) Such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear that such person's employment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact at such other person's place of employment or business, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity.

          (c) Stalking in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
          Please everyone on TS is then considered a stalker or has talked about a club or person on here. Same as what your doing there's a form of stalking for your self as well. Everyone is guilty on TS of stalking. You where going back n forth with comments as well, your just as guilty then. Your just the little pathectic botch that you are to bring this lame **** up. Typical little botch that you are. So go ahead keep posting that crap stalker

          Comment


            From Glen to Glen

            [QUOTE=Unregistered;2057248]
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

            Please everyone on TS is then considered a stalker or has talked about a club or person on here. Same as what your doing there's a form of stalking for your self as well. Everyone is guilty on TS of stalking. You where going back n forth with comments as well, your just as guilty then. Your just the little pathectic botch that you are to bring this lame **** up. Typical little botch that you are. So go ahead keep posting that crap stalker
            Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.


            Connecticut Online Harassment Attorneys


            Law Firm For Social Networking, Cyber Slander, and Internet Defamation Lawsuits in Connecticut and Massachusetts


            Social networking is one of the biggest growing technology platforms in the world. With the explosive growth in use and popularity, there have been numerous social networking lawsuits involving sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace and Twitter.

            As technology changes, so do we. At Raymond Law Group LLC, our Connecticut online harassment attorneys are up to date on the most widely used legal theories for claims involving lawsuits and Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. We are available to help clients in Connecticut and Massachusetts who have questions on legal options concerning social networking and the Internet. Contact us at 860-633-0580 to see how if we can help you.

            LinkedIn, Twitter, MySpace, and Facebook Lawsuits in Connecticut
            Many businesses and their employees use Web sites such as LinkedIn, Facebook, MySpace and Twitter to advertise, communicate with one another, share information and establish a network of contacts. Unfortunately, many times social networking sites are improperly used and a lawsuit can result from such things as Facebook wall postings, Twitter posts, LinkedIn status updates and client connections.

            Every business needs to have a social networking policy in place for employee use of social networking sites, such as Facebook or LinkedIn. The number of lawsuits related to social networking is rapidly increasing related to employee rights, privacy rights, defamation, breach of confidentiality and commercial disparagement. We can help you develop a social media policy at the workplace and for such matters as electronic monitoring and internet usage.

            One of the most unnerving developments with social media sites, such as Facebook, YouTube and MySpace, relates to an upward trend of cyber bullying, harassment, and invasion of privacy including cases connected to devastating suicides and other injuries. People of all ages, including middle and high school students, college students, and adults have faced incidents of intimidation, defamation, or harassment on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace. If this is happening to you related to work or school, you should consult an attorney to help stop the bullying, harassment, and defamation.

            Raymond Law Group LLC recently was asked by the media about lawsuits from Facebook and other social networking sites.

            Our attorneys can help you if you have questions regarding social networking, Web sites, the Internet and the following issues:
            •Defamation and slander
            •Cyber bullying, harassment
            •Privacy rights and Invasion of Privacy
            •Security concerns
            •Employment issues
            •Social networking, Social media policies
            •Trade secret disclosure
            •Information theft

            • Cyber liability


            Contact Our Hartford Invasion of Privacy Lawyers

            They can advise you as to the benefits and liabilities of using social networking. Contact us to set up an appointment so our technology lawyers can answer any questions you may have about social networking, defamation and the Internet.

            Comment


              From Glen to Glen

              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              You say who cares ? Hmmmm I wouldn't want my kid coached by a thief would you ? Having your child at his program or coached by RL is the same as you telling your child it's ok to steal . I'm a parent and I don't teach my children to steal . Back in the day they used too hang horse thiefs or if there was a argument or fight involving someone that stole usually ended in a gun duel. Come on haven't you ever watched Tombstone ? Luckily for Mr Lewis we're not in those times or he would have a short life span .
              Harassment charges can range from misdemeanor to high level felony charges. In many states, people charged with harassment will receive a higher level charge if they have previously been convicted of harassment, of communicating a threat, or of a domestic violence offense. Harassment by someone in violation of a restraining order may also draw a higher level charge. Some states elevate the charge if the harassment targeted someone based on race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation.

              Stalking and Menacing

              In some states, "stalking" is specified as a separate offense from harassment. Other states include both harassment and stalking under a single general statute. Stalking generally refers to a clear pattern of conduct through which the perpetrator causes the victim reasonable fear for their safety or their family's safety.

              Interstate stalking is a federal crime.

              Some states punish stalking as a form of "menacing." Menacing can often include ongoing actions, such as stalking someone, which cause reasonable fear in the victim. Menacing also often includes single acts which are purposefully intended to create a reasonable fear in someone, such as brandishing a weapon.

              Whether and how states draw lines between harassment, menacing and stalking varies greatly. For more specifics, see state stalking laws.

              Cyberstalking

              Some states have enacted specific laws against stalking someone online. "Cyberstalking" generally refers to stalking someone through the internet, email, text messages, or other means of electronic communication. Many states have revised their harassment and/or stalking laws to explicitly include harassing electronic communications. Some states also punish actions akin to cyberstalking under laws aimed at improper uses of computers or electronic communications networks.

              Federal law makes it a crime to "transmit in interstate commerce" (which includes the internet) a communication containing a threat to kidnap or physically harm someone.

              Comment


                From Glen to Glen

                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Good guess but wrong again mr .Richie Lewis . First off you've been slammed on here way before 2012 . I would say quite badly indeed. See when you make so many enemy's over the years it's really hard to tell where it's coming from . Maybe I'm a family member of the accuser who knows . Maybe I'm another club owner just wanting you to fall to have no competition in the area . Or maybe I'm a parent and you offended my child . Most likely this is a result of a bad relationship and didn't like how you treated me . The good thing out of this is I see that I'm getting to you. The way I see you mr. Richie Lewis is that you **** on people in general , you use people until your done with them and then kick them to the curb . You do unthinkable things for the greed of money !!!! You will go down better know as theif , crook, maybe shoplifter .
                Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.

                A number of key factors have been identified in cyberstalking:


                False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms, or other sites that allow public contributions such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[9]

                Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective.[10]

                Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims.[11]

                Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.

                False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him or her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.[12]

                Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.

                Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to magazines in the victim's name. These often involve subscriptions to pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the victim's workplace.

                Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[12]

                The posting of defamatory or derogatory statements. Using web pages and message boards to incite some response or reaction from their victim.[13]

                Comment


                  From Glen to Glen

                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Good guess but wrong again mr .Richie Lewis . First off you've been slammed on here way before 2012 . I would say quite badly indeed. See when you make so many enemy's over the years it's really hard to tell where it's coming from . Maybe I'm a family member of the accuser who knows . Maybe I'm another club owner just wanting you to fall to have no competition in the area . Or maybe I'm a parent and you offended my child . Most likely this is a result of a bad relationship and didn't like how you treated me . The good thing out of this is I see that I'm getting to you. The way I see you mr. Richie Lewis is that you **** on people in general , you use people until your done with them and then kick them to the curb . You do unthinkable things for the greed of money !!!! You will go down better know as theif , crook, maybe shoplifter .
                  Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.
                  Stalker Typologies

                  I. Rejected Stalkers: This type of stalker is motivated to pursue their victim in attempt to reverse what they perceive as a wrongful set of circumstances causing a prior divorce, separation or termination of a relationship. These offenders either feel misunderstood hoping to reverse the break up or feel angry and seeking revenge because their attempts at reconciliation with the victim has failed in the past.

                  II. Resentful Stalkers: This type of stalker can be dangerous given their perceived motivation for stalking. Resentful stalkers are fully aware the victim is cognizant of the stalking, but continues to fulfill a distorted vendetta he/she feels is warranted. Fear and distress experienced by the victim are the goals of this type of stalker. For this type of profile, the stalker believes the victim both deserves and requires being frightened because they have caused them and/or others anguish and distress.

                  III. Intimacy Seekers: This type of stalker does not have ill will towards their victim and simply wants to engage in a loving relationship with them. Intimacy seekers view their victims as their soul mate destined to be together at all costs. Within their mind, they believe it is their job and purpose to make sure destiny of a loving relationship is fulfilled. Intimacy seeker stalkers are often the segment of men or women who harass celebrities and public figures. Blinded by their distorted perceptions of a destined love, they lose sight of the distress and fear they are causing the person they stalk.

                  IV. Incompetent Suitors: These people who fit this profile are stalkers deeply enamored with their victim. Their interest for the victim at times can reach a state of fixation whereby their entire waking life is focused on the endeavor of one day becoming a couple. They tend to lack social, communication or courting skills and may feel entitled that their fantasy of a loving relationship is inevitable. Feeling entitled and/or deserving of a relationship with the victim inspires the stalker to gradually increase their frequency of contact. Although similar to the Intimacy Seeker stalker, incompetent suitors are more gradual in their means and methods of contact.

                  V. Predatory Stalkers: Of the five types, the predatory stalker is by far the most dangerous and determined. This type of stalker is motivated by a perverted sexual need. They engage in actively planning an attack and premeditation as the predator how he will go about engaging in a sexual act(s) with his victim. They do not have feelings of love for their victim nor motivated by a belief of predestination. Their fuel to dominate and victimize resembles the sociopath experiencing little to no remorse for the welfare of their victim.

                  Understanding the types of stalker and what motivates them is the first step in reducing the probability of becoming one of their victims. Unfortunately, many men, women and society in general minimize the stalker profile and mistakenly view these people as “unfortunate souls looking for love.” What people fail to understand is most of these predators engaged in stalking suffer troublesome psychiatric illnesses, psychological issues, or motivated by urges to sexually dominate their victim(s).

                  “Cyberstalking and online predators are new dangers since the birth of the Internet. People ranging in age from children to seniors now use the Internet for a multitude of reasons. As millions of people use Information and Communications Technology (ICT), millions more will become victims.” Michael Nuccitelli, Psy.D. (2014)

                  Most states have cyber stalking, cyber harassment and cyber bullying laws and/or include Information and Communications Technology within their traditional stalking or harassment laws. Protecting minors from online bullying and harassment have led states to enact cyber bullying laws. Cyberstalking is the use of Information and Communications Technology to stalk and refers to a pattern of threatening or malicious behaviors. Cyberstalking may be considered the most dangerous of the three types of information and communications technology harassment, based on posing a credible threat of harm. Legal sanctions range from misdemeanors to felonies and vary by state.

                  Cyber Harassment differs from Cyberstalking in that it is not involving a credible physical threat. Cyber harassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing messages using Information and Communications Technology to torment an individual, group or organization. Some states approach cyber harassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment laws, while others have created stand-alone cyber harassment statutes.

                  Comment


                    beachbum can we get this thread taken down

                    Signed the Rest of Us

                    PS not RL, Rocky, Cockroach, Fat Coventry Guy or Mr Troll

                    Comment


                      Is either Celtic branch at the OPI this year?

                      FWIW, even if Beachbum reads your note, he doesn't ever act on threads.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Is either Celtic branch at the OPI this year?

                        FWIW, even if Beachbum reads your note, he doesn't ever act on threads.
                        He has in the past ...

                        Comment


                          From Glen to Glen

                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          What's sad is that Rich Lewis is monster

                          What's even sadder is the people that support him and defend him knowing what
                          a monster he is. So to the people that support and defend him go F*** your self because your no better than he is.
                          Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.

                          A number of key factors have been identified in cyberstalking:


                          False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms, or other sites that allow public contributions such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[9]

                          Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective.[10]

                          Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims.[11]

                          Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.

                          False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him or her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.[12]

                          Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.

                          Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to magazines in the victim's name. These often involve subscriptions to pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the victim's workplace.

                          Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[12]

                          The posting of defamatory or derogatory statements. Using web pages and message boards to incite some response or reaction from their victim.[13]

                          Comment


                            From Glen to Glen

                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Here we go Rich snorting Lewis best come back is Being a ( grammar police ) his only comeback. Mr. Lewis is suppose to be so smart but his best come back is judging grammar wow this guy says he's educated, give me a break.

                            Rich first skill set is stealing and scamming parents.
                            Rich second skill set is losing more kids each year than he brings in.
                            Rich third skill set is being a broke Sob
                            Rich fourth skill set is scamming coachs out of their pay each year.
                            Rich fifth skill set is posting on his web page new coaches that actually won't coach.
                            Rich sixth skill set is being a fuking lier!!!

                            This little piece of garbage elf who thinks he's a somebody. Really your just trash that people want to throw away.
                            Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.

                            A number of key factors have been identified in cyberstalking:


                            False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms, or other sites that allow public contributions such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[9]

                            Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective.[10]

                            Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims.[11]

                            Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.

                            False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him or her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.[12]

                            Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.

                            Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to magazines in the victim's name. These often involve subscriptions to pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the victim's workplace.

                            Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[12]

                            The posting of defamatory or derogatory statements. Using web pages and message boards to incite some response or reaction from their victim.[13]

                            Comment


                              From Glen to Glen

                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              So RL how many quaaludes can you sniff in a day? How's the food in rehab, bet you missed those bidwell wings while in there.
                              Talking-Soccer.com reserves the right to reveal a member's identity, or whatever information we know about that member, including a member's IP number, in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by that member. Information shared publicly by the users here, should not to be used for mass mailings and we will not share your information with any outside agency except due to legal action. See previous rule.

                              A number of key factors have been identified in cyberstalking:


                              False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms, or other sites that allow public contributions such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[9]

                              Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective.[10]

                              Monitoring their target's online activities and attempting to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims.[11]

                              Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.

                              False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him or her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases.[12]

                              Attacks on data and equipment. They may try to damage the victim's computer by sending viruses.

                              Ordering goods and services. They order items or subscribe to magazines in the victim's name. These often involve subscriptions to pornography or ordering sex toys then having them delivered to the victim's workplace.

                              Arranging to meet. Young people face a particularly high risk of having cyberstalkers try to set up meetings between them.[12]

                              The posting of defamatory or derogatory statements. Using web pages and message boards to incite some response or reaction from their victim.[13]

                              Comment


                                And, don't you forget.
                                http://***********/oddmza5

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X