Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MLS Academy flexing muscle
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Wrong kids
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIn theory, sure. But most of the players MLS is developing 1) aren't good enough to go pro 2) don't want to go pro. College is a reality here. High level players have opportunities to play in college at a good discount, while going pro carries heaps of uncertainty and lousy rookie pay. If MLS splits off on their own they still have to grapple with those conflicting interests for many of their players
Initial recruitment is based in who can afford club soccer, futsal, trips abroad at 7- 10 years old.
Wrong sector of the population.
And Yes, the European/ South American model is tough, but that's how pro athletes are actually made. US doesn't make the cut for a reason.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTherein lies the problem. Chip is the mainstay of MLS academies. Kids who have nannies and LandRovers to drive them, being fed and WiFi-d after their elite schooling. Wrong kids are recruited to academies to begin with. Academies don't provide enough practice hours and full time practice for 16+.
Initial recruitment is based in who can afford club soccer, futsal, trips abroad at 7- 10 years old.
Wrong sector of the population.
And Yes, the European/ South American model is tough, but that's how pro athletes are actually made. US doesn't make the cut for a reason.
You miss part of the picture as well....'....16+'. How about more practice for the younger ages? That is when the training and developing starts. Game learning starts around 14/15....the kids have to have already started and should be well into developing by then.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTherein lies the problem. Chip is the mainstay of MLS academies. Kids who have nannies and LandRovers to drive them, being fed and WiFi-d after their elite schooling. Wrong kids are recruited to academies to begin with. Academies don't provide enough practice hours and full time practice for 16+.
Initial recruitment is based in who can afford club soccer, futsal, trips abroad at 7- 10 years old.
Wrong sector of the population.
And Yes, the European/ South American model is tough, but that's how pro athletes are actually made. US doesn't make the cut for a reason.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAmerican football seems to generate exceptional athletes with zero club influence and certainly no residential nonsense. Those athletes come through both high school and college.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAmerican football seems to generate exceptional athletes with zero club influence and certainly no residential nonsense. Those athletes come through both high school and college.
But men who want to go pro aren't well served going to college. College training isn't nearly the same as the pros, even vs MLS let alone abroad. MLB and the NFL use college as their farm system. Athletes get excellent training and more time to develop at no cost to them. Soccer just doesn't have that. There aren't top coaches who could also coach professionally, no big $ being made by schools to pump into programs. As USL expands I think that becomes the equivalent of the baseball farm team system, but it's not there yet. The pay is even worse than MLS rookie pay and players will still be torn about going to college.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAll MLS should be about developing professionals. Promoting college is a conflict of interest.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEven football is catching up a little bit to the pricey youth sports model, but not nearly to the extent soccer has. Basketball and track are other sports where you can still get noticed in high school, but also have travel programs, private trainers etc. For women, college soccer is the development path because there really isn't much of an alternative pro path to even chose from. Given the limited opportunities even after college as a female pro player (and financially) most will still go through college first and get that free degree. It won't help that rising star Mallory Pugh walked away from a free ride at UCLA to go pro and she was just knocked off the NT for the Olympics.
But men who want to go pro aren't well served going to college. College training isn't nearly the same as the pros, even vs MLS let alone abroad. MLB and the NFL use college as their farm system. Athletes get excellent training and more time to develop at no cost to them. Soccer just doesn't have that. There aren't top coaches who could also coach professionally, no big $ being made by schools to pump into programs. As USL expands I think that becomes the equivalent of the baseball farm team system, but it's not there yet. The pay is even worse than MLS rookie pay and players will still be torn about going to college.
- Quote
Comment
Comment