Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The latest from OHA

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Not to mention globally, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the flu kills 290,000 to 650,000 people per year.

    Maybe it's time to ban driving cars in the world since approximately 1.35 million people die in road crashes each year, on average 3,700 people lose their lives every day on the roads.

    Then the gran-daddy of them all according to estimates from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), in 2018 there were 17.0 million new cancer cases and 9.5 million cancer deaths worldwide.

    Lock-down Lunacy 2020.
    Go with facts worldwide thanks!

    Cherry picking random projections is left to the clown poster and their protester ilk who want lock arms in protest and then tell you stay home & save lives. Oregon's finest.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      2019-2020 flu season. CDC estimates 32,000-36,000 deaths in the United States. Covid deaths in the United States over 6 months...200,000. I know loud mouths like you hate to do (or acknowledge) math, but by all means please do the math. Also, Cars and Cancer are not contagious.
      Not a loud math but you have no math to lean on, just speculative numbers from the cdc without a source, the other poster posted real numbers (sourced) for many diseases and incidence of fatalities annually.. Cars and cancer are not infectious diseases but driving or having cancer puts you at a much greater risk of death then contracting the covid-19 virus.

      The less you know seems to be your contagion, so be itm with no math or reasoning skill required.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        2019-2020 flu season. CDC estimates 32,000-36,000 deaths in the United States. Covid deaths in the United States over 6 months...200,000. I know loud mouths like you hate to do (or acknowledge) math, but by all means please do the math. Also, Cars and Cancer are not contagious.
        Not the smartest member of the human race. Just imagine if we had done nothing to slow the spread of Covid, we would have lost millions of lives.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Not the smartest member of the human race. Just imagine if we had done nothing to slow the spread of Covid, we would have lost millions of lives.
          We would be Sweden moving forward much more quickly vs covid-19 with the lowest death rate amongst peer countries.

          Hindsight is 20/20 they say.

          https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/20...r-ctw-vpx.cnni

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Not a loud math but you have no math to lean on, just speculative numbers from the cdc without a source, the other poster posted real numbers (sourced) for many diseases and incidence of fatalities annually.. Cars and cancer are not infectious diseases but driving or having cancer puts you at a much greater risk of death then contracting the covid-19 virus.

            The less you know seems to be your contagion, so be itm with no math or reasoning skill required.
            Seasonal flu deaths this year to date -352,811
            Covid-19 deaths this year to date - 964,321

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Seasonal flu deaths this year to date -352,811
              Covid-19 deaths this year to date - 964,321
              So why the hell didn't we mask up to stop the spread of seasonal flu in the states and worldwide every year over the last century?

              This hyper restrictive response to covid-19 makes absolutely no sense especially in the global riot capital of Oregon, juxtaposition the annual 1/2 to 3/4 million death toll for seasonal flu you cite. Today with our ineffective flu vaccines these horrific flu death realities are patently ignored year after year.

              Thanks for pointing out the complete hypocrisy/hysteria over a novel cold virus that kills those with underlying conditions and those in their late 70's, 80's & approaching the century mark, or end of life..

              Keep the data coming, please.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                So why the hell didn't we mask up to stop the spread of seasonal flu in the states and worldwide every year over the last century?

                This hyper restrictive response to covid-19 makes absolutely no sense especially in the global riot capital of Oregon, juxtaposition the annual 1/2 to 3/4 million death toll for seasonal flu you cite. Today with our ineffective flu vaccines these horrific flu death realities are patently ignored year after year.

                Thanks for pointing out the complete hypocrisy/hysteria over a novel cold virus that kills those with underlying conditions and those in their late 70's, 80's & approaching the century mark, or end of life..

                Keep the data coming, please.
                Says the guy who’s family never washes their hands after crapping and who apparently seems daftly unaware we developed a flu vaccine, hence no masking, during seasonal flu season.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  So why the hell didn't we mask up to stop the spread of seasonal flu in the states and worldwide every year over the last century?

                  This hyper restrictive response to covid-19 makes absolutely no sense especially in the global riot capital of Oregon, juxtaposition the annual 1/2 to 3/4 million death toll for seasonal flu you cite. Today with our ineffective flu vaccines these horrific flu death realities are patently ignored year after year.

                  Thanks for pointing out the complete hypocrisy/hysteria over a novel cold virus that kills those with underlying conditions and those in their late 70's, 80's & approaching the century mark, or end of life..

                  Keep the data coming, please.
                  Many people do mask up during the flu season in other parts of the world you ding dong.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    So why the hell didn't we mask up to stop the spread of seasonal flu in the states and worldwide every year over the last century?

                    This hyper restrictive response to covid-19 makes absolutely no sense especially in the global riot capital of Oregon, juxtaposition the annual 1/2 to 3/4 million death toll for seasonal flu you cite. Today with our ineffective flu vaccines these horrific flu death realities are patently ignored year after year.

                    Thanks for pointing out the complete hypocrisy/hysteria over a novel cold virus that kills those with underlying conditions and those in their late 70's, 80's & approaching the century mark, or end of life..

                    Keep the data coming, please.
                    Here is all the data you need to know...You are a dyck. A selfish, thr and justified the means, selfish, not interested in others, just yourself, little, white, floppy dyck. The very fact that you lived to reach (what I assume is adulthood) should be all the reason you need to embrace the one irrefutable certainty in life, and that is that you get more, when you give more. God, I am so sick of you sycophantic minions of satan.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Says the guy who’s family never washes their hands after crapping and who apparently seems daftly unaware we developed a flu vaccine, hence no masking, during seasonal flu season.
                      With these stats why hasn't the mask been a mandated and business shut down for decades with seasonal flu?

                      How effective the flu vaccine is will vary from year to year. In a great year, when the flu vaccine is most effective, it can reduce your risk of getting sick by 60%. That means you have at least a 40% chance of getting the flu if you are exposed to it, even if you're vaccinated.(Feb 24, 2020)

                      You are so uneducated you think the vaccine for flu does the trick to stop the spread, figures.

                      That other guy might not wash up after a dump, but you are straight eating $h1t you ignorant tool.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Here is all the data you need to know...You are a dyck. A selfish, thr and justified the means, selfish, not interested in others, just yourself, little, white, floppy dyck. The very fact that you lived to reach (what I assume is adulthood) should be all the reason you need to embrace the one irrefutable certainty in life, and that is that you get more, when you give more. God, I am so sick of you sycophantic minions of satan.
                        Which explains why you can link arms with other fools in pointless riots defacing our beautiful city at all hours of night, along with hundreds of other unemployed clueless misfits, all the while not wearing a mask or keeping six feet of distance and then tell the people who want to go back to work and start again earning a living to support their families they are just selfish dycks not interested in others...says the hypocrite to his reflection in the broken mirror.

                        Your parents must be proud...you stupid bastard.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Some of us cant handle the truth so we keep the truth from them

                          [QUOTE=Unregistered;2844573]Well... there is a worldwide pandemic killing hundreds of thousands of people...[/
                          #14
                          Old 1 Hour Ago
                          Unregistered
                          Guest
                          https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...ed-risk-410796

                          “You just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed,” Trump said in a Feb. 7 call. “And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flus.”

                          “This is deadly stuff,” the president repeated for emphasis.

                          https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...3d4_story.html

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Study after study shows that the common flu is 3 times more deadly than COVID-19 for school age children. And the studies also show clearly that children are usually asymptomatic and don't spread the virus to adults (it's the adults that spread it to other adults and to children).

                            Let the kids play. Let them go to school. Just keep the adults separated.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              People can argue back and forth about this, but there are a few things that we can look at. First is it is very true that with children it is less deadly than many other things. However, the discussion is about kids bringing it home to older family members. With that being said the question would be if its risky for kids to be playing with other kids.

                              there are 2 soccer forward studies that have looked into this. And the numbers from those 2 say pretty strongly that it does not raise the risk of passing covid, and that playing soccer outdoors is a very low risk activity.

                              If you haven't yet look into Surf sports study where htey followed 6500 kids (and the coaches for those kids) for2 months. In that time they had 0 cases that happened from soccer. Every case (which there was about 15 if I remember) came from outside of soccer, and nobody passed it from one team mate to the other.

                              The other one that just came out was by university of Wisconsin. They followed 90K soccer players in 120 clubs in 34 states. In that they had less than 400 cases, and only 1 case was traced to player to player exposure. Not only is that very positive news, the actual rate of cases per 100K is less than the national average, which shows that its not raising the risks.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                People can argue back and forth about this, but there are a few things that we can look at. First is it is very true that with children it is less deadly than many other things. However, the discussion is about kids bringing it home to older family members. With that being said the question would be if its risky for kids to be playing with other kids.

                                there are 2 soccer forward studies that have looked into this. And the numbers from those 2 say pretty strongly that it does not raise the risk of passing covid, and that playing soccer outdoors is a very low risk activity.

                                If you haven't yet look into Surf sports study where htey followed 6500 kids (and the coaches for those kids) for2 months. In that time they had 0 cases that happened from soccer. Every case (which there was about 15 if I remember) came from outside of soccer, and nobody passed it from one team mate to the other.

                                The other one that just came out was by university of Wisconsin. They followed 90K soccer players in 120 clubs in 34 states. In that they had less than 400 cases, and only 1 case was traced to player to player exposure. Not only is that very positive news, the actual rate of cases per 100K is less than the national average, which shows that its not raising the risks.


                                The Surf study is flawed because they didn't do regular (daily or weekly) testing of all participants; the cases they noted were the cases they *noticed*, meaning symptomatic cases. Its viability as a scientific study is nil. The same goes for Wisconsin's study - without regular testing, the "study" is only finding symptomatic cases, which is a data point, but not the one you're looking for to justify your claim

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X