Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Orlando City Youth Club Observation
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI would imagine the smaller kids can be just as athletic as the taller ones, and they only difference then is the height and weight, and in some instances the smaller one is truly just as athletic, more skilled, but if the size doesn't match up to the bigger kids, they often times get overlooked. I think some are missing the point that smaller doesn't mean slow and clumsy, it just means they are actually smaller, but still athletic, quick (quicker often times). I've been around youth soccer to know it doesn't mean the small kid should play lawn darts, it just means they need to stick to it, not give up, even though they are overlooked because of size. If the smaller ones don't get discouraged, and give up after few years of being under appreciated, they actually can turn out to be great players. Also, if you have 2 athletic kids, one short, one tall, the tall one relying on size to dominate until about 13, not skill, the short one relying on skill, also using athleticism, the tall one will have a much harder time learning foot skill and technique once a teenager. Ball skills are difficult to master once a teenager, but if you practiced it a lot as pre-teen, the foundation is much better. That is the one with the better chance of success in my opinion.
Quite often the smaller kids are late bloomers and catch up a bit on the height side. They end up being the better all around player, but unfortunately some of these coaches will keep the big kid that was effective 2-3 years ago, hoping for that one chance they can score, while the better player is Pidgeon holed into coming off the bench or being subbed out. The better kid goes off to College and has a good experience, the one demensional big kid goes to college and transfers or quits playing all together.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostQuite often the smaller kids are late bloomers and catch up a bit on the height side. They end up being the better all around player, but unfortunately some of these coaches will keep the big kid that was effective 2-3 years ago, hoping for that one chance they can score, while the better player is Pidgeon holed into coming off the bench or being subbed out. The better kid goes off to College and has a good experience, the one demensional big kid goes to college and transfers or quits playing all together.
England vs. France for 3rd Place and these 2 teams are loaded with tall, athletic, very good players.
However, Japan vs. Spain for the Championship. Japan and Spain teams have mosty shorter, quicker, smaller players.
The difference was so striking that when I watched Japan beat England, England had a defender that was almost a foot taller than her mark! And Japan carved them up....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFIFA U-20 Women's World Cup - Finals tomorrow.
England vs. France for 3rd Place and these 2 teams are loaded with tall, athletic, very good players.
However, Japan vs. Spain for the Championship. Japan and Spain teams have mosty shorter, quicker, smaller players.
The difference was so striking that when I watched Japan beat England, England had a defender that was almost a foot taller than her mark! And Japan carved them up....
Of course along with first touch and constantly checking shoulders and analysis of where everyone's at along with awareness of the space
It's not flipping rocket science. American parents have allowed brits no longer wanted in their youth set ups at home to take control of our clubs and sabotage player development
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostQuite often the smaller kids are late bloomers and catch up a bit on the height side. They end up being the better all around player, but unfortunately some of these coaches will keep the big kid that was effective 2-3 years ago, hoping for that one chance they can score, while the better player is Pidgeon holed into coming off the bench or being subbed out. The better kid goes off to College and has a good experience, the one demensional big kid goes to college and transfers or quits playing all together.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFIFA U-20 Women's World Cup - Finals tomorrow.
England vs. France for 3rd Place and these 2 teams are loaded with tall, athletic, very good players.
However, Japan vs. Spain for the Championship. Japan and Spain teams have mosty shorter, quicker, smaller players.
The difference was so striking that when I watched Japan beat England, England had a defender that was almost a foot taller than her mark! And Japan carved them up....
Little vindication for US?
1-0 loss to Japan, close game
2-2 tie to Spain
Knocked out at group stage
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLittle vindication for US?
1-0 loss to Japan, close game
2-2 tie to Spain
Knocked out at group stage
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDid not watch either game, but based on what someone said earlier, and in looking at the National Team squads for each nation, Japan and Spain possess, are highly skilled, and have enormous soccer IQ, as that is something those nations look for in their players. We like strong, athletic, fast, with enough skill to make us competitive. The high soccer IQ and athletic enough will get trumped by the strong, athletic, fast, soccer IQ enough player. That is where we fail. You have to have a team with the majority of soccer players vs. athletes who play soccer. If you don't know the difference, that is part of the problem. We need to look at players and not get so caught up on "athletes" who can play.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI hear he is a good Coach. How is his 00/01 ECNL boys team going to do this year?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHaving had my child in both small and large clubs in FL, I have noticed that the small clubs seem to have less pressure to win, and do try and identify those with soccer talent, not just physical traits (such as size). These clubs try and develop their skilled players, whereas I have noticed the larger clubs are under pressure to win, so as to attract more kids, so the coach can one day move on to a better position. Wins matter in these big clubs, and that is why they select the physically dominant, because at younger ages you can win with that, as skill really plays a role when the kids bodies all mature, around 14 or so, and then they are on an equal level. The problem is, by that time, so many of the smaller skilled kids have been sitting on the bench, playing on 2nd teams, that they get discouraged and leave the sport, feeling they are not good enough. It's the culture of "win now" that is hurting youth soccer. Those in charge need to make a fundamental change to how they identify, develop talent, understanding wins will come, maybe just not immediately.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postyes GB and CM can spoon each other nightly
Orlando City DA dropped them both like bad habits. I understand son did not make DA team at MV so they moved to Detroit Michigan for a DA program
- Quote
Comment
Comment