Truth be told the state shouldn't have two ECNL teams, but as there are two...at the time FSA seemed like a good one to take over from S+. But they have squandered the badge, haven't improved the coaching. They do a poor job developing younger players, which catches up to them later when big athletic kids isn't enough.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The girls 2007 thread
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTruth be told the state shouldn't have two ECNL teams, but as there are two...at the time FSA seemed like a good one to take over from S+. But they have squandered the badge, haven't improved the coaching. They do a poor job developing younger players, which catches up to them later when big athletic kids isn't enough.
CT can have two ECNL teams. But you essentially have three today. If you were to mix the player and coaching talent at FSA and OW you'd have a very good ECNL club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot quite the truth. They tried to make some improvements. They got rid of some drift wood coaches and brought TD over from the boys side to coach the younger age groups 08s and 05s. TD considered one of the best coaches in NE. They also started instilling more technical skill training at younger ages as well. FSA's problem is similar to OW's, they split talent. At FSA the talent drops of quickly, same with OW. OW does a better job improving the lower half of the talent but not by much.
CT can have two ECNL teams. But you essentially have three today. If you were to mix the player and coaching talent at FSA and OW you'd have a very good ECNL club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot quite the truth. They tried to make some improvements. They got rid of some drift wood coaches and brought TD over from the boys side to coach the younger age groups 08s and 05s. TD considered one of the best coaches in NE. They also started instilling more technical skill training at younger ages as well. FSA's problem is similar to OW's, they split talent. At FSA the talent drops of quickly, same with OW. OW does a better job improving the lower half of the talent but not by much.
CT can have two ECNL teams. But you essentially have three today. If you were to mix the player and coaching talent at FSA and OW you'd have a very good ECNL club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot quite the truth. They tried to make some improvements. They got rid of some drift wood coaches and brought TD over from the boys side to coach the younger age groups 08s and 05s. TD considered one of the best coaches in NE. They also started instilling more technical skill training at younger ages as well. FSA's problem is similar to OW's, they split talent. At FSA the talent drops of quickly, same with OW. OW does a better job improving the lower half of the talent but not by much.
CT can have two ECNL teams. But you essentially have three today. If you were to mix the player and coaching talent at FSA and OW you'd have a very good ECNL club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot quite the truth. They tried to make some improvements. They got rid of some drift wood coaches and brought TD over from the boys side to coach the younger age groups 08s and 05s. TD considered one of the best coaches in NE. They also started instilling more technical skill training at younger ages as well. FSA's problem is similar to OW's, they split talent. At FSA the talent drops of quickly, same with OW. OW does a better job improving the lower half of the talent but not by much.
CT can have two ECNL teams. But you essentially have three today. If you were to mix the player and coaching talent at FSA and OW you'd have a very good ECNL club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
FSA has nothing. The club is so bad now. They’re ere getting better then boom back to the basement
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Comment