Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Privilege of Play: Why the world’s game is a white game in the U.S.
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
The Privilege of Play: Why the world’s game is a white game in the U.S.
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBut here YOU are reading the 🧵 which is stuck in its own corner in a soccer bbs ....what does that say about you?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
The Privilege of Play: Why the world’s game is a white game in the U.S.
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThere ya’ go - so NEXT time just head to a mirror and dig in! But until then keep coming back and drinking Trump’s sperm. And you will keep coming back. Qbwahahaha!
robbers, cheats, crooks and liars is in liberal dna.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFree stuff for everyone. The philosophy of the RATs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThe RATS have nothing to offer but the redistribution of wealth seized from those who have earned it and the normalization of BS excuses (its not my fault, it is the fault of the system, of the test, of anything and everything other than my own shortcomings). A philosophy for the weak minded who are incapable of competing and making their own way in life.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostRATs are the party of mediocrity because that is the only way to have "equality." RATs would rather have people equally mediocre and poor than have them unequally successful and rich. A really perverted philosophy.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostExcept for the elite in their party. Look at the wealth of the bidens, obamas, clintons, pelosis, and kennedys. This is how they are trying to fool Americans with their socialist agenda. They have theirs and by God no one else should have as much, or have the opportunity to have as much.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThat is one of the many things that makes the RATs the enemies of freedom and mankind. If the RATS had their way, all but a few dozen people of the ruling class would have nothing to live for. In a world with "equality" for all but the ruling class, there would be no more ambition, no more competition, no more exceptionalism. People would be deprived of the very essence of what it means to be human.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Cons just can’t stop bitching and moaning about the shellacking they’ve taken at the polls. The American people looked at the Cons’ record from 2016 -2020 and judged it a complete failure. As a result Cons no longer control the White House, the House, or the Senate.
Now Cons are just the party of crybabies.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBut that is why they want "equality." They are afraid of their own inadequacies. Afraid to compete. Afraid to be measured by their accomplishments, or lack thereof. Afraid to be measured as a man, for fear that they will be found wanting.
On the whole, the research shows, conservatives desire security, predictability and authority more than liberals do, and liberals are more comfortable with novelty, nuance and complexity. If you had put Buckley and Vidal in a magnetic resonance imaging machine and presented them with identical images, you would likely have seen differences in their brain, especially in the areas that process social and emotional information. The volume of gray matter, or neural cell bodies, making up the anterior cingulate cortex, an area that helps detect errors and resolve conflicts, tends to be larger in liberals. And the amygdala, which is important for regulating emotions and evaluating threats, is larger in conservatives.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostExcept for the elite in their party. Look at the wealth of the bidens, obamas, clintons, pelosis, and kennedys. This is how they are trying to fool Americans with their socialist agenda. They have theirs and by God no one else should have as much, or have the opportunity to have as much.
Lol. Try again, cons
6 out of 10 richest are cons btw
Senator Rick Scott R – Florida $259.7 million
Senator Mark Warner D – Virginia $214.1 million
Rep. Greg Gianforte R – Montana $189.3 million
Rep. Paul Mitchell R – Michigan $179.6 million
Senator Mitt Romney R – Utah $174.4 million
Rep. Vernon Buchanan R – Florida $157.1 million
Senator Mike Braun R – Indiana $136.8 million
Rep. Don Beyer D – Virginia $124.9 million
Rep. Dean Phillips D – Minnesota $123.8 million
Rep. Nancy Pelosi D – California $114.7 million
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMitch McConnell’s net worth is 34 million and he’s never had a job outside of politics.
Lol. Try again, cons
6 out of 10 richest are cons btw
Senator Rick Scott R – Florida $259.7 million
Senator Mark Warner D – Virginia $214.1 million
Rep. Greg Gianforte R – Montana $189.3 million
Rep. Paul Mitchell R – Michigan $179.6 million
Senator Mitt Romney R – Utah $174.4 million
Rep. Vernon Buchanan R – Florida $157.1 million
Senator Mike Braun R – Indiana $136.8 million
Rep. Don Beyer D – Virginia $124.9 million
Rep. Dean Phillips D – Minnesota $123.8 million
Rep. Nancy Pelosi D – California $114.7 million
- Quote
Comment
Comment