Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Region IV ODP Championships
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI've never seen an ECNL team (in Oregon or otherwise) lose 20-0. Seems like the parity in ECNL is at least better than ODP.
Pretty good deal for the 2000's too. Got to play 2 games in one day, got completely throttled in both, and flew home. $2000 for 1 day and 2 skunkings is money well spent. Way to go Timbers/Thorns!!!!
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
This years Arizona 02 ODP team is completely different from last year. Look at the roster! Most of them left to play for the Thorns Academy. That's why the Oregon 02 ODP team is doing so poorly.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
03Gs holding their own. Lost to WA 1-2 on a late goal. WA beat AZ 7-0 yesterday for some context.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post03Gs holding their own. Lost to WA 1-2 on a late goal. WA beat AZ 7-0 yesterday for some context.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThanks Mom! 2003 is a decent team but played very weak teams like Montana & New Mexico. Top WA players don't do odp...but still good to only lose by a goal. 2004s played SoCal & the CA 2004s haven't lost many to Ecnl, etc so are still strong. Hence the loss by 9 goals. There is no argument that OR girls generally lose in regional competitions. Same story for many many years.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNot to mention that WA enters 2 teams so neither is as strong as they could be - and the best players do ECNL, not ODP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post03Gs holding their own. Lost to WA 1-2 on a late goal. WA beat AZ 7-0 yesterday for some context.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOregon had the potential to field a good team at this age. Imagine if the 10-15 top girls hadn't left over the past couple months/year. This is probably true of all age groups.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThanks Mom! 2003 is a decent team but played very weak teams like Montana & New Mexico. Top WA players don't do odp...but still good to only lose by a goal. 2004s played SoCal & the CA 2004s haven't lost many to Ecnl, etc so are still strong. Hence the loss by 9 goals. There is no argument that OR girls generally lose in regional competitions. Same story for many many years.
Oregon parent that could only dream of their dd playing at such high competition.
Let me shed light on your lack of understanding. WA 2004(U13) girls. There is a pool
about 40 which 18 got picked for the travel team. These 40 girls probably represent
all of the new crop of ECNL girls for next tryouts. Not all of them, but most of them
will go to ECNL. Top girls do EPD. They represent the top clubs in western wa.
WA2003(U14). These girls are ECNL age. About 30 are in ECNL out of 40 pool.
The travel team of 18 are almost all ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick
around.
WA2002(u15). Most of the girls again are ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick around. There is a girl with a verbal to a D1 school in seattle in this pool who is region iv and ecnl already.
There is a drop off u16+, but by then, your dd should be in ECNL and be in the college
recruit cycle.
ODP matters if you are in the state travel team and if you are region iv player, then it is all
good.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAhh, you must be a parent of dd who couldn't make XF, SU, or WPFC ECNL or a wistful
Oregon parent that could only dream of their dd playing at such high competition.
Let me shed light on your lack of understanding. WA 2004(U13) girls. There is a pool
about 40 which 18 got picked for the travel team. These 40 girls probably represent
all of the new crop of ECNL girls for next tryouts. Not all of them, but most of them
will go to ECNL. Top girls do EPD. They represent the top clubs in western wa.
WA2003(U14). These girls are ECNL age. About 30 are in ECNL out of 40 pool.
The travel team of 18 are almost all ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick
around.
WA2002(u15). Most of the girls again are ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick around. There is a girl with a verbal to a D1 school in seattle in this pool who is region iv and ecnl already.
There is a drop off u16+, but by then, your dd should be in ECNL and be in the college
recruit cycle.
ODP matters if you are in the state travel team and if you are region iv player, then it is all
good.
Do you know that your understanding of what Ecnl is in wa is far far off what it actually is and what it is shifting to.
Do everyone a favor the next time you get your parent soap box out with a fraction of misninformation you spew. You make your fellow parents look bad.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Oregon Ecnl teams wouldn't even come close to a Spokane team or an eastside team.
They lose to B team from Washington.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSend the Oregon ECNL teams and clean up. Send the Timbers girls and get throttled. Hmmm...
Oregon Ecnl teams aren't even top 3 in their own state. They would be 2nd division in wa. Nothing has changed in 15 years.
It is so funny how dumb you sound right now!
You remind me of the toxic parent that seems to try and sell lies everywhere they go.
Everyone knows that one Oregon Ecnl parent that lies to everyone because of how badly they got scammed.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Washington teams are trying to get out of Ecnl. They are tired of wasting money playing terrible teams from Oregon. More bad teams are entering the league to make money for the league.
Washington teams top 6 clubs have always killed Oregon teams and just because two clubs put an acronym in front of their team name just as the Timbers alliance teams for some reason think Timbers means something, doesn't change how bad they are.
Expect Oregon Ecnl teams to play worse and worse teams from Idaho and expect the wa teams to go DA. More people are seeing the Ecnl scam for what it is in both states and that's why they can't get the best players.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAhh, you must be a parent of dd who couldn't make XF, SU, or WPFC ECNL or a wistful
Oregon parent that could only dream of their dd playing at such high competition.
Let me shed light on your lack of understanding. WA 2004(U13) girls. There is a pool
about 40 which 18 got picked for the travel team. These 40 girls probably represent
all of the new crop of ECNL girls for next tryouts. Not all of them, but most of them
will go to ECNL. Top girls do EPD. They represent the top clubs in western wa.
WA2003(U14). These girls are ECNL age. About 30 are in ECNL out of 40 pool.
The travel team of 18 are almost all ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick
around.
WA2002(u15). Most of the girls again are ECNL. If your dd is region iv, then they stick around. There is a girl with a verbal to a D1 school in seattle in this pool who is region iv and ecnl already.
There is a drop off u16+, but by then, your dd should be in ECNL and be in the college
recruit cycle.
ODP matters if you are in the state travel team and if you are region iv player, then it is all
good.
- Quote
Comment
Comment