Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trump blames parkland massacre on shooter’s “neighbors and classmates”
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEXACTLY!!!!!!And the lobbyists intentionally use the anti-freedom stance to stir up emotions
- Background checks and waiting periods - universal, not state to state
- License required and if you don't have one there's a steep fine and you lose the gun until you get one
- Required safety (written and practical) and vision testing, repeated every few years
- Insurance required for anyone owning a gun. Again, if you don't have it you lose it
- Stronger restrictions and implementation of already existing laws on people convicted of violent crimes as well as domestic abuse and stalking
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI don't get why it is so hard for lawmakers to implement some basic universal gun guidelines, but if they don't they won't be voted back in. Trump says he wants a more universal data base so the law enforcement agencies and the FBI can be more effective. It really shouldn't take such big legislation to get things done. The FBI should do it. It is the job of the FBI and law enforcement to protect, and why should the FBI need the senators to tell them how to do their jobs more effectively or to improve their systems.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEXACTLY!!!!!!And the lobbyists intentionally use the anti-freedom stance to stir up emotions
- Background checks and waiting periods - universal, not state to state
- License required and if you don't have one there's a steep fine and you lose the gun until you get one
- Required safety (written and practical) and vision testing, repeated every few years
- Insurance required for anyone owning a gun. Again, if you don't have it you lose it
- Stronger restrictions and implementation of already existing laws on people convicted of violent crimes as well as domestic abuse and stalking
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostTell this to the bro's in Chicago. They would laugh and go cap someone else that night. 679 murders in 2017, total 3561 shot. 70 dead in 2018 so far. Two months!!! See how gun control works. Gun control is working great there. A wonderful Liberal state.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEXACTLY!!!!!!And the lobbyists intentionally use the anti-freedom stance to stir up emotions
- Background checks and waiting periods - universal, not state to state
- License required and if you don't have one there's a steep fine and you lose the gun until you get one
- Required safety (written and practical) and vision testing, repeated every few years
- Insurance required for anyone owning a gun. Again, if you don't have it you lose it
- Stronger restrictions and implementation of already existing laws on people convicted of violent crimes as well as domestic abuse and stalking
- You must have a background check to make sure you have never made biased, hateful or dishonest statements.
- you must be licensed to make public verbal or written statements
- Required to have any statement you make are reviewed to make sure they are acceptable
- You must carry liability insurance just in case anyone is offended or harmed by your statements
- If you are ever convicted of using objectable speech you are no longer allowed to speak, write or communicate your ideas in any public forum.
Do be so quick to let emotions allow you limit your rights granted in our Constitution.
I do not own a gun, I am former military and grew up in CT. My family and my friends family all owned guns. As a teenager, we had more fear of the punishment we would receive from our dads if we ever touched the guns with our permission then if we got caught doing anything else.
Please stop using the term assault rifle. You can not go down to your local gun shop and buy an assault rifle.
The problem is not access to guns. The problem is the long-term attack on the nuclear family.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf we don't start somewhere asking for gun licensure and penalties for not not have a license and insurance, then every city could end up like Chicago.
Anyway what does insurance have to do with any of this?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI don't think you get it. Crazies and murders, crooks ect don't care about LAWS. LAWS are just words to them . They laugh at the people who think that a LAW is going to stop what they do or are getting ready to do. Law abiding citizens obey the law.
Anyway what does insurance have to do with any of this?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDo you think you have the right to confiscate legally purchased private property of a law-abiding citizen ? This is America, not the CCCP.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAll nations have mental health issues. None have the easy access to guns that we do.
I repeat - guns have been around for a long time, plenty of guns back in the 1950s - why are school shootings only happening now? How are they any different than all of the atrocities we see in gun-free Europe?
The answer (hippies will not like)?
Liberals. Breakdown of the traditional family. Leads to mental illness. Voila. Many of you people here are good examples of this phenomena - recognize it, fix it, overcome.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou can also say what ever want (free speech) but with limitations. Same applies here:
"And in fact the line from Justice Holmes in Schenck v. United States is “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” That “falsely” is what’s doing the work, both in Justice Holmes’s hypothetical, and in how such a false shout would be treated by First Amendment law today. Knowingly false statements of fact are often constitutionally unprotected — consider, for instance, libel, fraud, perjury, and false light invasion of privacy. That would presumably apply to knowing falsehoods that cause a panic. (Even given bit complicated by the Stolen Valor Act case, such knowing falsehoods that are likely to cause tangible and immediate harm are likely to be punishable, as the concurrence suggests.)"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.82f07e8088a3
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIf we don't start somewhere asking for gun licensure and penalties for not not have a license and insurance, then every city could end up like Chicago.
There goes that argument...
Lets get to the root of the problem. The real cause. Liberalism. Hedonism. Godlessness. Narcissism. Ignorance masquerading as academic enlightenment.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Multiple posts within minutes of each other all blaming liberals. Get some new material and next time try to at least peretend you're not the same poster
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMultiple posts within minutes of each other all blaming liberals. Get some new material and next time try to at least pretend you're not the same poster
- Quote
Comment
Comment