Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
high school coaches and the off season?
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhere do you people come up with this nonsense. State tournament roster has Zero to do with the rule. Go read the rules again. They were posted yesterday.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostState tourney makes sense considering JV players can get moved up during the season. If it were based on beginning of the year, what stops a coach from moving up 5 more players from JV as soon as he files the roster early fall?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI tried really hard to find it - my head nearly exploded; who wrote that? - but where is the rule that says it is limited 6 players of any level vs it just being 6 varsity players? If a large HS like Staples has frosh, JV and varsity, that can easily exceed 6 club players, but not necessarily 6 varsity players, especially since he coaches U15 club. Page?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAgain, it never specifies level, simply on the school roster. All players are on the school roster regardless of level.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
It's state tournament roster. Don't you think the AD at Staples has fielded 100 calls about this.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt's state tournament roster. Don't you think the AD at Staples has fielded 100 calls about this.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostShow us exactly where in the rule book your point is supported. I posit the same to other poster claiming it is the state tourney roster. CIAC folk must be paid based on the length of their god damm handbook
2.1 b
http://www.casciac.org/pdfs/ciachandbook_1920.pdf
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
school athletes whose names appeared on the CIAC eligibility list for the sport in the
preceding season and have CIAC eligibility remaining in the sport which they coach
except under the exceptions listed in item 2.1.e. below (lists some sports excluded).
Still nothing on one team or all teams. Leave it to CIAC to take pages to explain nothing
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post2.1b. Member schools may not permit their coaches to coach or instruct their member
school athletes whose names appeared on the CIAC eligibility list for the sport in the
preceding season and have CIAC eligibility remaining in the sport which they coach
except under the exceptions listed in item 2.1.e. below (lists some sports excluded).
Still nothing on one team or all teams. Leave it to CIAC to take pages to explain nothing
Staples is in obvious violation of this rule.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Not @ Staples and correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't he been there for a few years? No doubt this issue has been raised with CIAC multiple times by competing coaches or shady parents. Never underestimate what others will do to try and disqualify a competitor. Seems CIAC is cool with it.
- Quote
Comment
Comment