Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opportunity Gap

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Save your insults, they don't work on me.

    There was nothing wrong with my statement. The expenditure was indeed allocated, you just don't agree with the method used. Compare the scenario to the one that Dems in Congress use every day, like rammming PelosiCare down everyone's throats. Arm twisting, bribes, backroom deals , pork, on and on. You Libs are so high and mighty, in that whatever you do is justified, Repubs are always dirty. Nancy and Harry and the Democratic Congress that had control Bush's last two years did plenty of damage. Then Obama handed them the keys to the Treasury. The results? 6 $$ Trillion more in debt in 4 years. More than Bush in 8 years.
    Not insults. The day I want to insult you you will know it...

    Your comment from post #758:"The expenditures for the wars were allocated expenses within the Defense Budget."

    I countered with a link to an article from a conservative friendly author (getting ready to hoist you again...you played right into it because you commented on the author...glad you noticed....bwawhahhah...

    That author stated, as I quoted in #764 "These runaway costs do not include a single dollar from the Pentagon’s annual operating budget"

    But then you come back in #774 with:

    There was nothing wrong with my statement. The expenditure was indeed allocated"

    "expenditures for the wars were allocated expenses within the Defense Budget" (you)

    "These runaway costs do not include a single dollar from the Pentagon’s annual operating budget" (deRugy)

    If you don't get it who is supervising you? I am concerned you lack the critical self-awareness to take care of yourself properly.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Not insults. The day I want to insult you you will know it...

      Your comment from post #758:"The expenditures for the wars were allocated expenses within the Defense Budget."

      I countered with a link to an article from a conservative friendly author (getting ready to hoist you again...you played right into it because you commented on the author...glad you noticed....bwawhahhah...

      That author stated, as I quoted in #764 "These runaway costs do not include a single dollar from the Pentagon’s annual operating budget"

      But then you come back in #774 with:

      There was nothing wrong with my statement. The expenditure was indeed allocated"

      "expenditures for the wars were allocated expenses within the Defense Budget" (you)

      "These runaway costs do not include a single dollar from the Pentagon’s annual operating budget" (deRugy)

      If you don't get it who is supervising you? I am concerned you lack the critical self-awareness to take care of yourself properly.
      I did not comment on the author.
      One opinion, one author is all you stated.
      The nonsesne that goes on in Congress everyday is like 3 card monty. Remember the cold hard fact that CONGRESS authorized the war. You talk like the Iraq war all of a sudden created an army out of thin air. Much of what was used was exisiting equipment, the troops, the munitions, etc. all within the budget. All youIbs lived for for 8 yearsas to trash Bush. When Obama is done, people will be begging for the 5 % unemployment rate we had under him. Remember all the crying about the " horrible Bush economy" ?
      Obama is the best of them all playing 3 card monty with our money. Harry , Nancy and him have added 6 trillion to the deficit. Eevn if I grant you the fact of 1-2 trillion for Iraq, where did the 6 trillion gohat Obama has added. Giveaways to cronies, losers, bums, lazy, etc.

      And once again, your snide comments and attempts at some sort of superiority are as hollow as the pipe youmoke in your Liberal dreams.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        How is it this information wasn't available before the election????
        Move along people - nothing to see here - just another manufactured "outrage" - like Benghazi.

        Talk about picking pepper out of flypoop....

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          I did not comment on the author.
          One opinion, one author is all you stated.
          The nonsesne that goes on in Congress everyday is like 3 card monty. Remember the cold hard fact that CONGRESS authorized the war. You talk like the Iraq war all of a sudden created an army out of thin air. Much of what was used was exisiting equipment, the troops, the munitions, etc. all within the budget. All youIbs lived for for 8 yearsas to trash Bush. When Obama is done, people will be begging for the 5 % unemployment rate we had under him. Remember all the crying about the " horrible Bush economy" ?
          Obama is the best of them all playing 3 card monty with our money. Harry , Nancy and him have added 6 trillion to the deficit. Eevn if I grant you the fact of 1-2 trillion for Iraq, where did the 6 trillion gohat Obama has added. Giveaways to cronies, losers, bums, lazy, etc.

          And once again, your snide comments and attempts at some sort of superiority are as hollow as the pipe youmoke in your Liberal dreams.
          Exactly how do they calculate that OBama is responsible for the debt crisis. Such appalling stupidity....

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Pure smallball. Want to talk about aholes? Republicans are floating the idea to apportion electoral college votes according to their gerrymandered congressional districts. Result? Romney would have won last election despite losing popular vote 47-53).

            Now tell us that the Republcicans are not the party of sore losers who rather than believing in our system now want to change the rules so that they can win despite the fact that they hold minority positions in the country.

            Sore loser bitter-ender aholes. Note that even some Republicans are pushing back.
            Mr. Know-it-all Liberal apparently is unaware of the true origina. From the token lefty at Forbes:

            "I am not going to pretend that the Republicans have cornered the market on taking the low road in these matters— particularly when I know that Democrats have not just behaved exactly as the Republicans, but have actually shown the GOP how it’s done when it comes to playing the game with no eye towards fairness or the future.....this nefarious GOP plan to ‘steal’ elections is not original to the Republicans.

            It was in 2004 that Colorado Democrats recognized that they could take a major step towards locking in the state for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry if they could succeed in scraping their own winner-take-all system and bring proportional representation to the electoral vote in Colorado.

            The reason for the sudden desire to usher in such a new voting system in Colorado?

            Someone did the math and recognized that had such a proportional system been in place four years earlier, Democratic candidate Al Gore would have won enough additional electoral votes in Colorado to not only get the electoral edge in the state—but would have acquired enough extra electoral votes to actually put Gore in the White House.

            The Democrat’s 2004 argument in support of the Colorado plan would become all too familiar in 2012-2013—although the justifications, revolving around giving voice to all voters in a state, would now come from the mouths of Republicans rather than the Democrats.

            As a result of the efforts to rig the Colorado system for Democrats, Amendment 36 was placed on the ballot to great fanfare—gaining support from Democrats around the nation even as it was, as one would expect, condemned by Republicans everywhere.

            ....disappearing with the Colorado initiative so beloved by Democrats in 2004 is their own right to express this newly found outrage over the efforts by Republicans to usher in such a system now that the shoe is on the other foot.

            The result of these efforts to subvert fairness from both sides of the political divide is the same—moral superiority is forever forfeited by those who would act for immediate—if unfair—gain without regard for principle or the future political blowback sure to result when setting aside fair play for current benefit."






            http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickunga...ty-politics/2/

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Dear completely clueless wingnut who is unable to process the simplest factual data:

              Going to go over this real, real slow ....try to follow now

              1) Here are the raw vote totals from the three towns you mentioned:


              Brown Warren

              Cambridge 7,463 41,127

              Lowell 13,905 19,678

              Springfield 13,888 39,520

              ------- -------

              35,256 100,325

              2) After summation (above) we can determine that Warren's total margin of victory in the three cities that Mr. Wingnut tells us "won her the election" was 65,069 votes.

              3) Here are the votal totals for the whole state:

              Brown warren

              Total 1,449,180 1,678,408

              That is the total I have with 2,171 out of 2,172 districts reporting. Don't think that one district made much of a difference to Scottie. Bwawhah.

              4) That gives us a margin of victory for Warren of 229,228 votes.

              5) Conclusion: when we subtract the figure in #2 (above) from the toal in #4 (above) we learn two things:

              a) IF a single vote had not been cast in cambridge, lowell, and springfield, Elizabeth Warren would have STILL won by the substantial margin of 164,159 the INCUMBENT

              b) [b] Our local wingnut is either unable or unwilling to look up real data before making his grandiose claims (Cambridge, Springfiel, Lowell "won her election') or is possibly unable to add and subtract. I guess it is also possible that losing by over 160,000 votes is tantamount to a "win" to a wingnut because perhaps it isn't quite the shallacking thatthey were expecting.

              In any case, thank you again mr wingnut for allowing me to once again show that you take even the simplest statement from wingnut at face value at your peril when it comes to wingnuts and the wingnutosphere. They are just so deranges and unhinged that they are truly unable to reason their way out of a paper bag.

              Have a good weekend wingnut? Feeling bit less hostile after your diatribes?

              I'm having a fairly busy morning but it seemed lighter once I was able to show you to be a clueless buffoon again.

              You should stop making simple wrong statement like the one above unless you don't like grooving fastballs over the plate to people who know exactly what to do with your ignorance....

              its pointing out facts like this that led your buddy warren to block me...although he was at least civil unlike you.

              Guess you can't block here huh? Oh well, may I suggest you either self-censor or continue to help me to show those last couple middle of the roaders why your brand is just dead in the water....when you cannot even read a table and make the correct conclusions from objective data, there isn't much hope for you.


              Now wingnut...going to stay true to form...going to ignore the atual votes and double down on your statement. Please...make my day...
              You totally missed the original poster's point which was the inner cities (you know those communities getting those free Obamaphones) and the moonbats such as yourself who live in places like Cambridge. S/He wasn't specifically using the numbers from Cambridge, Lowell and Springfield.

              http://www.boston.com/news/special/p...ults-2012.html

              Comment


                [QUOTE=Unregistered;912018]Mr. Know-it-all Liberal apparently is unaware of the true origina. From the token lefty at Forbes:

                /QUOTE]

                Yep. Wingnut finds what he describes as a "token" lefty and we are all supposed to just be raptured.

                Hilarious. Isn't your outrage gland worn out yet?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  You totally missed the original poster's point which was the inner cities (you know those communities getting those free Obamaphones) and the moonbats such as yourself who live in places like Cambridge. S/He wasn't specifically using the numbers from Cambridge, Lowell and Springfield.

                  http://www.boston.com/news/special/p...ults-2012.html
                  So...how many places like Cambridge are there in MA?

                  Typical rightard. Despite the fact that the majority of people in the state live in non-rural areas, they think its wrong that votes from those areas actually help elect someone resulting in majority rule.

                  Yep. They just de-legitimize anyone who doesn't agree with them.

                  I really enjoy that you life in MA. Must really be painful for someone like you to live in such a blue state. Fantastic.

                  OF course, the majority of the country IS blue. We live in a center left nation. Tee hee.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    You totally missed the original poster's point which was the inner cities (you know those communities getting those free Obamaphones) and the moonbats such as yourself who live in places like Cambridge. S/He wasn't specifically using the numbers from Cambridge, Lowell and Springfield.

                    http://www.boston.com/news/special/p...ults-2012.html
                    Original poster = your sock puppet

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Whoever is posting Breitbart doesn't link...they cut and paste and don't attribute...the Breitbart link admission was under pressure when I pressed about the inattention to proper elementary school attribution (boy wingnuts complain about today's education but they sure didn't take advantage of theirs in the good old days).

                      O

                      Bwawhahhah
                      Pressure from an unknown liberal panty waist hand wringer who is delusional to boot. Now that is funny MENTAL MIDGET!!! BWAHAHHAHAHAHA. I will cut and paste and put quotes where ever I damn well please - punk. I know you want to meet for conversation. Righhht keep dreaming thug!

                      Comment


                        Liberal Fox News Contributor and Daily Beast columnist Kirstin Powers on the Obama-Hillary Clinton "60 Minutes” interview:

                        “It really was something you’d expect from the state-run media. It was that kind of level of propaganda… This was a joke. You look at it and just not challenging basic things…”

                        Even liberals, at least clear thinking ones, are starting to wake up. A bit too late though. A cut and paste from a place i refuse to name but you could probably guess.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Liberal Fox News Contributor
                          Burst out laughing when I read the first three words you wrote.

                          Clueless.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Pressure from an unknown liberal panty waist hand wringer who is delusional to boot. Now that is funny MENTAL MIDGET!!! BWAHAHHAHAHAHA. I will cut and paste and put quotes where ever I damn well please - punk. I know you want to meet for conversation. Righhht keep dreaming thug!

                            Yep. You cry about being insulted but listen to you...completely unhinged.

                            This is why your brand lost SOOOO badly in the last election. I mean, you had been losing (four out of 5 national votes before that). But your hubris and arrogance sent you over teh top and people came out in droves so the election would not be close enough to steal it as the anti-Deomcratic Republicans did once before.

                            Shellacked. CLobberd. And no chance for better.

                            Go away footnote.

                            And please.....disrespect all rules of attribution and citation...call me names and act like a lunatic....that is what i want because the more you rant, the more decent people you turn off and the larger and larger our margins of victory will be in the future. Keep appealing to others just like yourself but no one else....bwawhahhah.

                            If you ever had to look me in the eye you would dump a load in your pants.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Yep. You cry about being insulted but listen to you...completely unhinged.

                              This is why your brand lost SOOOO badly in the last election. I mean, you had been losing (four out of 5 national votes before that). But your hubris and arrogance sent you over teh top and people came out in droves so the election would not be close enough to steal it as the anti-Deomcratic Republicans did once before.

                              Shellacked. CLobberd. And no chance for better.

                              Go away footnote.

                              And please.....disrespect all rules of attribution and citation...call me names and act like a lunatic....that is what i want because the more you rant, the more decent people you turn off and the larger and larger our margins of victory will be in the future. Keep appealing to others just like yourself but no one else....bwawhahhah.

                              If you ever had to look me in the eye you would dump a load in your pants.
                              probably would as most of you people are quite ugly and smelly. Like I said libtard we shall see in the next election and if it goes your way i will admit the end of this country as we know it. It probably is the end now - just another banana republic with obama in there and his socialist and muslim brotherhood appointments.

                              BTW big ugly smelly one the only one who comes across as angry here is you.

                              Brush your teeth you will feel better.

                              Comment


                                [QUOTE=Unregistered;912042]
                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Mr. Know-it-all Liberal apparently is unaware of the true origina. From the token lefty at Forbes:

                                /QUOTE]

                                Yep. Wingnut finds what he describes as a "token" lefty and we are all supposed to just be raptured.

                                Hilarious. Isn't your outrage gland worn out yet?
                                There you go again, trying to discredit the messenger while totally ignoring the message. Now that deserves a TEE HEE!

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X