Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

May 18&19 ecnl games

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    2 of the 3 weakest clubs. FSA is by far the weakest club in the conference.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      You must be a CFC U16 parent. Its the only team that's done. Stats aren't final yet. FSA has yet to play two of the weakest clubs in the NE.
      Yeah and the stats didn't include the win over Stars East this weekend. FSA U16s now on top of CFC in the standings. So Nah guy is right on the U16s. FSA better a team.

      Comment


        #48
        Hahahahahahahahahahaha. FSA is the WORST CLUB in the Northeast Conference. Bragging about a 2 win team

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Yeah and the stats didn't include the win over Stars East this weekend. FSA U16s now on top of CFC in the standings. So Nah guy is right on the U16s. FSA better a team.
          Shortest midget contest!

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Yeah and the stats didn't include the win over Stars East this weekend. FSA U16s now on top of CFC in the standings. So Nah guy is right on the U16s. FSA better a team.
            Put it back in your pants Nah. Both would have 8 points.

            Comment


              #51
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Put it back in your pants Nah. Both would have 8 points.
              Both U16 teams are neck and neck bad. CFC admits it while FSA tries to prop them up as superior because they have little else to brag about. No club, not even top clubs, will have top teams consistently across all their age groups. Some years you get really lucky with talent, others you don't. Coaching matters too. However, big picture there is no doubt which club overall is performing better against the same competition and in college placements. In the case of FSA another critical piece parents should consider is that performance has declined since they bought S+. Trending down isn't a good trend.

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Both U16 teams are neck and neck bad. CFC admits it while FSA tries to prop them up as superior because they have little else to brag about. No club, not even top clubs, will have top teams consistently across all their age groups. Some years you get really lucky with talent, others you don't. Coaching matters too. However, big picture there is no doubt which club overall is performing better against the same competition and in college placements. In the case of FSA another critical piece parents should consider is that performance has declined since they bought S+. Trending down isn't a good trend.
                Nah, FSA ECNL girls U18s, U16s, U14s better than CFC's.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Put it back in your pants Nah. Both would have 8 points.
                  Hey CFC dad, who won head to head? Current rankings show CFC 14th out of 15 teams. FSA ahead with two games left to play while CFC is done.

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Nah, FSA ECNL girls U18s, U16s, U14s better than CFC's.
                    This is a tired statement. Not even funny any longer (although I’ll admit, it was last year).

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Hey CFC dad, who won head to head? Current rankings show CFC 14th out of 15 teams. FSA ahead with two games left to play while CFC is done.
                      hey FSA dad, bragging about being 13th vs 14th of 15 is nothing but a pathetic focus on minutia. Look at your club overall - it's awful. U14 to U19 there's three teams in 2nd to last place in their divisions, another that's 11th (woot woot!) and the U16s that are third to last place. If ECNL wasn't so busy battling GDA right now FSA would be in jeopardy of losing their badge.

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Question Man Responds

                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Both U16 teams are neck and neck bad. CFC admits it while FSA tries to prop them up as superior because they have little else to brag about. No club, not even top clubs, will have top teams consistently across all their age groups. Some years you get really lucky with talent, others you don't. Coaching matters too. However, big picture there is no doubt which club overall is performing better against the same competition and in college placements. In the case of FSA another critical piece parents should consider is that performance has declined since they bought S+. Trending down isn't a good trend.

                        And what is the primary reason that one club here performs consistently better against these "barometers" than the other?

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Question Man Responds

                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          hey FSA dad, bragging about being 13th vs 14th of 15 is nothing but a pathetic focus on minutia. Look at your club overall - it's awful. U14 to U19 there's three teams in 2nd to last place in their divisions, another that's 11th (woot woot!) and the U16s that are third to last place. If ECNL wasn't so busy battling GDA right now FSA would be in jeopardy of losing their badge.

                          Do you think this is the dialogue that goes on between the various fans of clubs facing relegation in all those leagues across the sea? Would they be arguing about who is the best of the bottom as we do here?

                          Yet, is "awful" really the word we want to apply in assessing a club? Are you suggesting these kids, who are out there giving their best, are not worthy of the same respect as those kids playing for clubs that win more games?

                          Isn't some club always going to be at the bottom? What do you suggest they do? Disband? Then what do you do with the new club now at the bottom? If these clubs are so bad, then why do they have so many kids there? Who should get the ECNL badge possessed by FSA, if not them? What club has shown itself as capable or as worthy?

                          What is the point of this ongoing debate?

                          Comment

                          Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                          Auto-Saved
                          x
                          Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                          x
                          Working...
                          X