Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    ^^^^^ con LOVES an oligarch who can by elections ....

    Bloomberg spent $79 million last few days more than all
    Dem candidates combined since they announced .

    So con is thrilled by that. Wants it just like Russia.....genuflect before your billionaire lords !

    BTW what was Lavrov doing in oval today? Changing the batteries on the bugs?
    Sorry “buy” of
    Course

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      I do recall someone saying there was no strategy during the Obama administration. Now do we see why Trump wants out?
      Who took us to war in Iraq and Afghanistan ? Remind me

      Comment


        Nadler says Article 1 of impeachment will charge "abuse of power" by the president, and Article 2 will charge him with "concealing evidence" about how he abused his power. Wait. If you don't have the evidence, how can you charge Article 1? Seems the articles cancel each other out

        Comment


          A slip of the tongue.

          Nancy Pelosi: "Was it 2-1/2 years ago that, uh, they initiated, uh, the Mueller, uh, investigation? It is, uh, not about speed. It’s about urgency. If we did not hold him accountable, he would continue to undermine our election. It is not with any speed. This has been going on for a very long time, but there is a sense of urgency. That is what is at stake in this election.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Must be why they're looking at putting another 15,000 in Saudi Arabia
            Trump will send a million to protect their oil if they ask.

            FOX is so fun right now. Jesse Waters is white hot scared

            Comment


              Bloomberg headline at 5:02 pm:

              *TRUMP WARNED LAVROV AGAINST ELECTION MEDDLING, WHITE HOUSE SAYS

              Article cites WH sources

              Headline at 5:35 pm:

              *LAVROV SAYS HE DIDN'T DISCUSS U.S. ELECTIONS WITH TRUMP

              Quoting Lavrov

              Can cons explain ?

              LMAO

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Who took us to war in Iraq and Afghanistan ? Remind me
                You have to be reminded about 911 and the involvement of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan???

                Is this another example of libs trying to rewrite history?

                Why yes it is.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment, accusing President Donald Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. CBS's Major Garrett discusses why it is significant that they did not charge Trump with bribery or extortion. Garrett said they backed off charges they seemed excited about last week because "they clearly don't believe they have the evidence to make that case stick."

                  http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ml?jwsource=cl
                  Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.

                  Comment


                    Hey Cons, how about that Inspector General’s report. Was it everything you hoped for? Lol

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      You have to be reminded about 911 and the involvement of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan???

                      Is this another example of libs trying to rewrite history?

                      Why yes it is.
                      Iraq slipped your mind?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.
                        So? Any prosecutor goes with the charges that have the best chance for a conviction. Also all you cons keep ignoring the 2nd charge, obstruction of Congress. There's no subtext to that. Did he obey his people not to hand over documents or testify, ignoring Congressional subpoenas? Yes.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Democrats did not include "bribery" or "quid pro quo" in their articles of impeachment against President Trump because they realized that the charge could backfire and bring down their own front-runner.
                          Tou cons can't let go of the fact that Biden or his son did nothing illegal.

                          Comment


                            Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Tou cons can't let go of the fact that Biden or his son did nothing illegal.
                            Hold on there snowflake....Hunter may or may not be innocent (personally I think he is)....but this whole thing started because Joe Daddy needed to be investigated (hence the liberal whistle blower)....FACT.

                            So lets let the Joe Daddy investigation be completed so we know the TRUTH!!!!!
                            If Joe Daddy is innocent why does he not want to be investigated?
                            If you are innocent, why do you need to take the 5th?

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Hold on there snowflake....Hunter may or may not be innocent (personally I think he is)....but this whole thing started because Joe Daddy needed to be investigated (hence the liberal whistle blower)....FACT.

                              So lets let the Joe Daddy investigation be completed so we know the TRUTH!!!!!
                              If Joe Daddy is innocent why does he not want to be investigated?
                              If you are innocent, why do you need to take the 5th?
                              You aren’t making any sense at all anymore.

                              In other news, a certain someone has tweeted or retweeted over FORTY times so far today.

                              Think the news about Greta is bugging him ?

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                You have to be reminded about 911 and the involvement of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan???

                                Is this another example of libs trying to rewrite history?

                                Why yes it is.
                                Yeah but why couldn’t Bush win and withdraw? He had what seven years? By the time he handed his hot mess there and Iraq to the next president (what was his name? ) the GOP has created a quagmire in both places.

                                Can you tell us about those “aluminum tubes” in Iraq? GOP lied us into that war.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X