Read the below on the Mass forum...interesting yet concerning analysis. Seems pretty detailed and on point.
I coach Women's Soccer at a D1 University and here are some roster/program facts (which would pretty much hold true at any school)
1) Most college rosters these days average between 26-32.
2) As a parent/player, I would be hesitant to consider any program with over 33 or 34. That is simply too many players to manage, and you may end up on the 'farm team'
3) We have never received "pressure" to recruit just to land more tuition dollars for the school (!?)
4) To train effectively at college level, it's necessary to be able to play full field. Even with a roster of 30, it's barely feasible at times (you may have 4 GKs, and half a dozen injured at any given time). We don't necessarily like having to manage 30 players, but it is necessary to create the most effective and functional training environment
5) Do the math----with 30 players, more will NOT play than do play. We can only put 11 on field
Some facts resulting from the 2020 Covid mess/extra year of eligibility:
1) The extra year will have significant impact for the 21s/22s/23s/24s
2) You would be very surprised how many parents ARE willing to pay money for an extra year because of how badly they feel for what these kids have been through. We had already committed a full slate of 2021s before shutdown and have no money to continue scholarships for any seniors yet 3 or 4 are going to stay for the Fall semester and pay for it themselves just to have another season.
3) There are currently 404 players in the D1 WSocc transfer portal and that number will be much higher when the spring season concludes in a couple months
4) Experience is KING. it's a no brainer for us to pay to have a four year seasoned 22yr old stay as opposed to bringing in an unproven 18 year old. Many of them are in situations where Mom and Dad are willing to pay for Grad school since they had a scholarship for undergrad OR some are getting underload waivers where they graduate and are just taking a class or 2, which doesn't cost much.
5) The situation is creating a logistical nightmare for us recruiting-wise as we try to project our depth charts for '23 and '24 classes. For example, if the current freshmen and sophomore players that we have and would want to stay do stay, we have 32 on our 2023 roster without having committed any 2023s yet!
My personal opinion is that this mess will create anywhere from 25% to 60% less total available roster spots across all programs through 2024.
I coach Women's Soccer at a D1 University and here are some roster/program facts (which would pretty much hold true at any school)
1) Most college rosters these days average between 26-32.
2) As a parent/player, I would be hesitant to consider any program with over 33 or 34. That is simply too many players to manage, and you may end up on the 'farm team'
3) We have never received "pressure" to recruit just to land more tuition dollars for the school (!?)
4) To train effectively at college level, it's necessary to be able to play full field. Even with a roster of 30, it's barely feasible at times (you may have 4 GKs, and half a dozen injured at any given time). We don't necessarily like having to manage 30 players, but it is necessary to create the most effective and functional training environment
5) Do the math----with 30 players, more will NOT play than do play. We can only put 11 on field
Some facts resulting from the 2020 Covid mess/extra year of eligibility:
1) The extra year will have significant impact for the 21s/22s/23s/24s
2) You would be very surprised how many parents ARE willing to pay money for an extra year because of how badly they feel for what these kids have been through. We had already committed a full slate of 2021s before shutdown and have no money to continue scholarships for any seniors yet 3 or 4 are going to stay for the Fall semester and pay for it themselves just to have another season.
3) There are currently 404 players in the D1 WSocc transfer portal and that number will be much higher when the spring season concludes in a couple months
4) Experience is KING. it's a no brainer for us to pay to have a four year seasoned 22yr old stay as opposed to bringing in an unproven 18 year old. Many of them are in situations where Mom and Dad are willing to pay for Grad school since they had a scholarship for undergrad OR some are getting underload waivers where they graduate and are just taking a class or 2, which doesn't cost much.
5) The situation is creating a logistical nightmare for us recruiting-wise as we try to project our depth charts for '23 and '24 classes. For example, if the current freshmen and sophomore players that we have and would want to stay do stay, we have 32 on our 2023 roster without having committed any 2023s yet!
My personal opinion is that this mess will create anywhere from 25% to 60% less total available roster spots across all programs through 2024.
Comment