Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Looking forward to 2020 meltdown.
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Apparently you're blind to the irony of posting a video claiming facts are more important than emotions, while continuing to cling to your denial of the quid pro quo proven in the impeachment inquiry.
In other words, the bald chick in the video is YOU, dude.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostApparently you're blind to the irony of posting a video claiming facts are more important than emotions, while continuing to cling to your denial of the quid pro quo proven in the impeachment inquiry.
In other words, the bald chick in the video is YOU, dude.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
That should say spin it not spend it. I had to correct myself because you obviously have nothing and would start attacking me for using the wrong word
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAre you upset? No quid pro quo why are you having such a hard time understanding that? Holmes couldn't even say what else he heard on the call. Witnesses said no quid pro quo no bribery no extortion. You can spend it any way you want but the freaks in the video are on your team. Did you shed a tear election night?
https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...quo-tv-2019-11
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostApparently you're blind to the irony of posting a video claiming facts are more important than emotions, while continuing to cling to your denial of the quid pro quo proven in the impeachment inquiry.
In other words, the bald chick in the video is YOU, dude.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDenial of quid pro quo? Dude that case was so weak Schiff had to change it 4 times after his own focus group said quid pro quo won’t work. So what does he do? Checks all the other boxes of extortion, bribery, and witness intimidation. What does that tell you? You’re own party knew quo’s pro quo was all shît. 😂
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostPlease explain the video clip in post #7 above.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSeriously? That’s your argument? Trump “essentially” admitted to quid pro quo. That’s exactly what the whole impeachment inquiry had shown us all. “He essentially”, “I presumed”, “I was told”, “I was my understanding”, “I believed”.... where is the actual proof? Did you even watch the inquiry? How many times did the witnesses testify that it’s not uncommon to hold up aide until certain stipulations are met. It happens frequently. Didn’t we learn that from the hair sniffer Creepy Joe? The guy bragged about it on national TV and he did nothing wrong. He held up aide until one of his conditions were met. Past POTUS have done the same. All the witnesses testified that Trump was concerned with Ukrainian corruption but he can’t ask questions before giving millions to a unknown corrupt government? They also testified that Trump has done far more than Obama to help Ukraine to defend themselves. I get it, you wanna get this guy but you have to prove something. Feelings, presumptions, and beliefs aren’t gonna do it. You would’ve thought you’d learn that after the Russia hoax.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou're joking, right? Even Trump is giving up on the "didn't do it" narrative. You better pivot quickly - you're in danger of being connected to the absolute lamest of the ever-changing excuses from Trump's apologists.
- Quote
Comment
Comment