Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wheaton women soccer season over

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Wheaton women soccer season over

    To the Wheaton community,

    The past few days have been disturbing and challenging for our community. A Wheaton student chose to wear blackface as part of an offensive and racist Halloween costume, and the incident raises difficult issues for all of us.

    I am particularly dismayed that this student did not act alone, but was part of a group of other individuals who actively participated in this event and then attempted to cover it up. This runs counter to the value that our community places on creating an inclusive and welcoming educational environment. This is something for which each of us has responsibility. We need to make those expectations clear.

    As a result, the women’s soccer team will not be allowed to compete in the NEWMAC tournament game that was scheduled for Saturday at MIT, ending their season. The team recognizes this is the right decision and accepts the outcome. This action is separate from, and will not replace, the student conduct hearing process involving specific individuals now underway. Rather, it is intended to signal a clear message that offensive and racist behavior will not be tolerated at Wheaton.

    I want to reiterate that the incident that took place last weekend was deeply offensive, but it reflects attitudes that go beyond this one event and that is my greatest concern. The college community aspires to be a place that welcomes a diverse group of students from every background and perspective, from across the country and around the world. Despite the many educational programs that Wheaton offers to encourage an inclusive environment, it is clear that we are falling short.

    Many of you know that Wheaton has been working on improving the community’s support for diversity and inclusion long before this incident took place. In fact, the college has been engaged in developing a strategic plan on this that encompasses every aspect of the college—from the recruitment and retention of a diverse faculty and staff workforce to the quality of student life. This work has been led by Dean of Students Kate McCaffrey and Professor of Psychology Peony Fhagen, and it has involved consultation with many groups of students, faculty and staff as well as alumni and the Board of Trustees. Several steps outlined in the plan have already been taken, such as the formation of the Center for Social Justice and Community Impact and the hiring of a director for the program. Other initiatives will be implemented soon as we know we have a great deal of work to do.

    Over the next several weeks, the task force that has coordinated the development of our diversity and inclusion plan will hold a series of meetings to offer opportunities to comment on our plans. I see this as an important step in moving forward on a plan to which so many people have contributed. I urge everyone to take the time to participate in these meetings.

    This is a difficult moment for the college and our community and I am convinced that we can use this incident as a rallying point to build a better, more welcoming and inclusive place for all students, faculty and staff. I hope you will join me in this important work.


    Sincerely,
    Dennis M. Hanno
    President

    #2
    Well done President Hanno..punish the collective team for the action of one, possibly two, members where the actions do NOT reflect on the culture of that team (unlike the Harvard socccer team in Nov 2016).

    That's really setting the example for your student body - you'll be punished if you are not the enforcers of a very nuanced and complex issue. Nice to end the season for 28 other girls who worked hard to have a 15-3 season due to one player - hmm..maybe suspend the one player (or two) unless you have proof the team collectively was involved?

    No, you have to bow to the politics and "do something" right away.

    I bet you support NAACP call to boycott American, but Emirates Air has long been accused of racist behavior toward Indians and other non-Middle Eastern groups and when you were at Babson you gave its chairman a big old award - hmm..maybe his $19B and Babson's money making enterprise in the Dubai blinded your stance there?

    I'm sure Babson in that case would say "well, it's just a few employees, you can't punish the whole company or its CEO"..but the lowly women's soccer team at Wheaton..that you can punish.

    An article quoted another stadent as saying "she was also disturbed to see students donning other offensive costumes as well, such as students dressed as blind people, homeless people or Mexicans." Are you investigating to find out who those students are and what organizations they belong to in order to 'send a message?"

    Team is okay with your decision..right..ask them in a setting where being truthful won't expose them to being called racist or insensitive because they don't want to be personally punished for the stupid actions of a teammate..but you have to appease the politically correct..

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Well done President Hanno..punish the collective team for the action of one, possibly two, members where the actions do NOT reflect on the culture of that team (unlike the Harvard socccer team in Nov 2016).

      That's really setting the example for your student body - you'll be punished if you are not the enforcers of a very nuanced and complex issue. Nice to end the season for 28 other girls who worked hard to have a 15-3 season due to one player - hmm..maybe suspend the one player (or two) unless you have proof the team collectively was involved?

      No, you have to bow to the politics and "do something" right away.

      I bet you support NAACP call to boycott American, but Emirates Air has long been accused of racist behavior toward Indians and other non-Middle Eastern groups and when you were at Babson you gave its chairman a big old award - hmm..maybe his $19B and Babson's money making enterprise in the Dubai blinded your stance there?

      I'm sure Babson in that case would say "well, it's just a few employees, you can't punish the whole company or its CEO"..but the lowly women's soccer team at Wheaton..that you can punish.

      An article quoted another stadent as saying "she was also disturbed to see students donning other offensive costumes as well, such as students dressed as blind people, homeless people or Mexicans." Are you investigating to find out who those students are and what organizations they belong to in order to 'send a message?"

      Team is okay with your decision..right..ask them in a setting where being truthful won't expose them to being called racist or insensitive because they don't want to be personally punished for the stupid actions of a teammate..but you have to appease the politically correct..
      Win as a team, lose as a team. You better believe the entire team should be accountable for the actions of just a few of its members. That sort of thing doesn't happen nearly enough. Refreshing.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Win as a team, lose as a team. You better believe the entire team should be accountable for the actions of just a few of its members. That sort of thing doesn't happen nearly enough. Refreshing.
        exactly. well said. and who says it's a complex and nuanced issue? It totally isn't. not excusing the emirates issue- not sure about the details there but i've flown emirates many times and never seen or experienced anything remotely racist.

        Comment


          #5
          Been a rough year for Wheaton soccer. If this was a few players, suspend those players. Punishing the team for the actions of a few is absurd. Feel good BS. If a player cheated on a test, would the entire team get punished? Why is this the fault of the team? The girls should say nothing and refuse to play next year. Just dont show up for training camp.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Win as a team, lose as a team. You better believe the entire team should be accountable for the actions of just a few of its members. That sort of thing doesn't happen nearly enough. Refreshing.
            This is a ridiculous stance. What does being on a team have to do with what one does "off the field"?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Been a rough year for Wheaton soccer. If this was a few players, suspend those players. Punishing the team for the actions of a few is absurd. Feel good BS. If a player cheated on a test, would the entire team get punished? Why is this the fault of the team? The girls should say nothing and refuse to play next year. Just dont show up for training camp.
              I am inclined to agree here. In all levels of sports, the actions of a single player (especially at a non-team event) result in only the individual being punished. The nature of publicity and perception is most likely the driver behind the schools decision. However, I do not think any players should refuse to play, why punish yourself by not playing the sport you have dedicated your life too?!

              It is worth noting the stellar efforts of the coaching staff and other players. After a rough season last year, their record speaks for itself and they were on course for being serious NCAA contenders. I haven't read Coach Desilets names in any reports, which is pleasing, as I understand he imposed internal suspensions to the players (for the quarter-final game which they won 2-1) that behaved so unacceptably. It is a true shame that his leadership won't be rewarded with a Conference Title game or NCAA appearance.

              Watch this space, Wheaton will be back!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                I am inclined to agree here. In all levels of sports, the actions of a single player (especially at a non-team event) result in only the individual being punished. The nature of publicity and perception is most likely the driver behind the schools decision. However, I do not think any players should refuse to play, why punish yourself by not playing the sport you have dedicated your life too?!

                It is worth noting the stellar efforts of the coaching staff and other players. After a rough season last year, their record speaks for itself and they were on course for being serious NCAA contenders. I haven't read Coach Desilets names in any reports, which is pleasing, as I understand he imposed internal suspensions to the players (for the quarter-final game which they won 2-1) that behaved so unacceptably. It is a true shame that his leadership won't be rewarded with a Conference Title game or NCAA appearance.

                Watch this space, Wheaton will be back!
                I wouldn't want to play for a school with such weak leadership. They sacrificed these girls at the altar of political correctness. If the coach had already disciplined the players in a prior game why the over reach ? This was done for PR purposes. Disgusting and hypocritical. The administration allowed the prior punishment. Looks like they are trying to curry favor here. Or protect their brand. All at the expense of innocent student athletes. Sacrificial lambs.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  I wouldn't want to play for a school with such weak leadership. They sacrificed these girls at the altar of political correctness. If the coach had already disciplined the players in a prior game why the over reach ? This was done for PR purposes. Disgusting and hypocritical. The administration allowed the prior punishment. Looks like they are trying to curry favor here. Or protect their brand. All at the expense of innocent student athletes. Sacrificial lambs.
                  it was pretty bad behavior by more than one player (much worse that is described in the email). How do you know that the majority of the team (or even let's say four or five other players) did not tacitly approve of this? i.e. wink wink ha ha kind of thing. most of them share rooms or live on the same floor. only one non-white player on the entire team.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    it was pretty bad behavior by more than one player (much worse that is described in the email). How do you know that the majority of the team (or even let's say four or five other players) did not tacitly approve of this? i.e. wink wink ha ha kind of thing. most of them share rooms or live on the same floor. only one non-white player on the entire team.
                    Suspend whomever was directly involved. Hearsay is crapola. If the administration can prove what you allege, go for it. If they can't, this is a flawed argument. If you are going to punish the entire team for what they MIGHT have known, that is a dangerous precedent.

                    Does the team get collective credit for good deeds? If a few players make Deans list, everyone should right? The team was likely very supportive of the smart kids, so everyone should benefit. Absurd, right? Why is the corollary any less absurd.

                    If I was a potential Wheaton recruit I would steer clear. Too many other options to sign up for a school that impugns the character of 25-30 girls based on the actions of a few.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Suspend whomever was directly involved. Hearsay is crapola. If the administration can prove what you allege, go for it. If they can't, this is a flawed argument. If you are going to punish the entire team for what they MIGHT have known, that is a dangerous precedent.

                      Does the team get collective credit for good deeds? If a few players make Deans list, everyone should right? The team was likely very supportive of the smart kids, so everyone should benefit. Absurd, right? Why is the corollary any less absurd.

                      If I was a potential Wheaton recruit I would steer clear. Too many other options to sign up for a school that impugns the character of 25-30 girls based on the actions of a few.
                      This is an Ayn Rand like argument ie your analogy about good grades. This is ugly racism perpetrated by multiple members of the team. why do whites see this as nuanced and complex? it just isn't.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        This is an Ayn Rand like argument ie your analogy about good grades. This is ugly racism perpetrated by multiple members of the team. why do whites see this as nuanced and complex? it just isn't.
                        Suspend the multiple members who did the act. Simple. Don't assume everyone else knew or condoned. If you can prove it, then by all means. "Whites" tend to get a bit sensitive about being accused of racism because certain "white" people gave been racist. My guess is that many "white" players were disgusted by this. Some of them may have said something. This generation is far less racist than prior generations. Progress for sure.

                        It also sounds like Wheaton may have a diversity problem. The very thought of doing something this moronic is enabled by a lack of diversity. In addition, only one non-white on the team?

                        As far as your Ayn Rand argument, I disagree. Accountability is eroded if you apply socialistic metrics for a group either for positive or negative reasons

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Win as a team, lose as a team. You better believe the entire team should be accountable for the actions of just a few of its members. That sort of thing doesn't happen nearly enough. Refreshing.
                          Using that logic the Houston Astros team should have been shutdown after the slur by one player. PC run amok. Punish those involved and move on.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Suspend the multiple members who did the act. Simple. Don't assume everyone else knew or condoned. If you can prove it, then by all means. "Whites" tend to get a bit sensitive about being accused of racism because certain "white" people gave been racist. My guess is that many "white" players were disgusted by this. Some of them may have said something. This generation is far less racist than prior generations. Progress for sure.

                            It also sounds like Wheaton may have a diversity problem. The very thought of doing something this moronic is enabled by a lack of diversity. In addition, only one non-white on the team?

                            As far as your Ayn Rand argument, I disagree. Accountability is eroded if you apply socialistic metrics for a group either for positive or negative reasons

                            This was pretty egregious - like the Harvard soccer team incident. Not everyone was complicit there either. We don't really know in this case. I hope the president uncovered enough to to find that several were complicit in this. On a related subject, hate crimes have gone up dramatically in this country since the Nazi got into power. Colleges like Wheaton are right to take a very strong stance here.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Would you folks be screaming bloody murder if the team was having a terrible season? Probably not. Kudos to the Wheaton president. A very courageous and important move for a society in decline.

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X