I would think an NPL lic is something that should only be issued to non-profit clubs.
I would think the leagues would frown on issuing licenses to for profit organizations since their incentive is to make a profit.
Non-profits are also more willing to give out scholarships and financial assistance.
With for profits you can not see if they are doing this and may be making their teams for the wealthy only and not allowing players from a lower income family the same fair shot at the team as a non-profit organization would.
I am not saying that for profit clubs should not exist, it is a free and open market but I do not think those organizations should be allowed to profit off such a lic.
NPL, ECNL and DAP should only be issued to non-profits organizations, does anyone else agree?
I would think the leagues would frown on issuing licenses to for profit organizations since their incentive is to make a profit.
Non-profits are also more willing to give out scholarships and financial assistance.
With for profits you can not see if they are doing this and may be making their teams for the wealthy only and not allowing players from a lower income family the same fair shot at the team as a non-profit organization would.
I am not saying that for profit clubs should not exist, it is a free and open market but I do not think those organizations should be allowed to profit off such a lic.
NPL, ECNL and DAP should only be issued to non-profits organizations, does anyone else agree?
Comment