Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Royal Oaks fields even worse than Amelia Earhart

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Royal Oaks fields even worse than Amelia Earhart

    What is going on with FYSA? How can they select such horrible fields for state cup? Amelia Earhart fields were a dust bowl of mostly dirt. Royal Oaks didn't have quite as much dirt but the field was full of divots. So much so that the ball didn't roll on the field rather it bounced instead. Both fields made for horrible soccer. FYSA should be ashamed.

    #2
    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    What is going on with FYSA? How can they select such horrible fields for state cup? Amelia Earhart fields were a dust bowl of mostly dirt. Royal Oaks didn't have quite as much dirt but the field was full of divots. So much so that the ball didn't roll on the field rather it bounced instead. Both fields made for horrible soccer. FYSA should be ashamed.
    How much did you lose by?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      What is going on with FYSA? How can they select such horrible fields for state cup? Amelia Earhart fields were a dust bowl of mostly dirt. Royal Oaks didn't have quite as much dirt but the field was full of divots. So much so that the ball didn't roll on the field rather it bounced instead. Both fields made for horrible soccer. FYSA should be ashamed.
      Royal Oaks wasn't just bad, it was dangerous. One of our players sprained his ankle when he stepped in one of the many holes.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        What is going on with FYSA? How can they select such horrible fields for state cup? Amelia Earhart fields were a dust bowl of mostly dirt. Royal Oaks didn't have quite as much dirt but the field was full of divots. So much so that the ball didn't roll on the field rather it bounced instead. Both fields made for horrible soccer. FYSA should be ashamed.
        You must be U17 San Carlos Park Scorpion and didn't get the goal difference to advance as second place.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          You must be U17 San Carlos Park Scorpion and didn't get the goal difference to advance as second place.
          You must be the idiot with FYSA that selected the field.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            How much did you lose by?
            Your right it only affects the teams that play real soccer where the field makes a difference when you dribble and pass the ball! Therefore you must be the team that boots the ball!😀😀

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Your right it only affects the teams that play real soccer where the field makes a difference when you dribble and pass the ball! Therefore you must be the team that boots the ball!😀😀
              So the inferior team beat the superior team do to field condition, that makes sense.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Your right it only affects the teams that play real soccer where the field makes a difference when you dribble and pass the ball! Therefore you must be the team that boots the ball!😀😀
                Right, because the rest of the world plays in immaculate fields and that's why they're better than us.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  So the inferior team beat the superior team do to field condition, that makes sense.
                  Not necessarily but the crappy fields do alter the quality of play and that's a shame. And it's "due" not "do" that should have been used in your post.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    We played there and did not lose, and I agree the fields were crap. I know field conditions are not always optimal, but for State Cup I think they could do a little better job finding good ones, especially in this case when there were only a few games to be played. Many fields should have been available.
                    It is obvious those fields have been bad for a while so not like they all of a sudden became that bad all of a sudden. Unfair and dangerous to both teams, but especially teams that play real soccer. Just ugly to watch that ball bounce all over the place. Too many nice field complexes in this state to have to deal with those conditions when it counts the most.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Right, because the rest of the world plays in immaculate fields and that's why they're better than us.
                      Anybody that ever held any promise at a young age didn't play on dirt fields for very long.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        What is going on with FYSA? How can they select such horrible fields for state cup? Amelia Earhart fields were a dust bowl of mostly dirt. Royal Oaks didn't have quite as much dirt but the field was full of divots. So much so that the ball didn't roll on the field rather it bounced instead. Both fields made for horrible soccer. FYSA should be ashamed.
                        News flash............FYSA doesn't won the fields and can't use fields that clubs and parks don't make available. Why don't you quite whining and offer your fields if they are so great. Then maybe they would be choices in finding decent fields to play on.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Anybody that ever held any promise at a young age didn't play on dirt fields for very long.
                          Anybody that held any promise at a young age never used the field conditions as an excuse.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            You must be U17 San Carlos Park Scorpion and didn't get the goal difference to advance as second place.
                            Orlando City didn't have a problem with the field when they scored 5 goals against you.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Not necessarily but the crappy fields do alter the quality of play and that's a shame. And it's "due" not "do" that should have been used in your post.
                              You should have placed a comma after "necessarily" and you shouldn't start a sentence with "and".

                              Comment

                              Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                              Auto-Saved
                              x
                              Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                              x
                              Working...
                              X