I think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ECNL idea
Collapse
X
-
UnregisteredTags: None
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostEnd of the day, if you do not have enough of QUALITY training hours, there is no point in travelling and playing, specially none of it is a revenue generator but only an expense?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhat it might do is eliminate R3PL. Most likely many of the clubs that participate in R3PL would be the next clubs looked at. R3PL is actually a bigger expense then ECNL and it would tier the clubs based on performance.
Yes, the name implies ELITE CLUBS.
Then why they can poach?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMight be smart for ECNL to get more clubs while it can otherwise clubs will band together in a different league and be just as competitive as ECNL.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI think that the ECNL should set up a second league of 72 clubs. This would create a top league and a second league. Every year they should move the bottom 7 clubs to the 2nd league and move the top 7 clubs up based on overall club performance. One club from each conference up and one down. Thoughts?
ECNL can provide a good platform to showcase and compete against the best in games.
but games do not develop players.
Players are developed through standardized training curriculum.
If ECNL cannot enforce its own standards to its existing clubs, what is the point in expanding it?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDon't disagree at all. though In our state they have, its the NPL (FPL). I'd throw the R3pL in there too but they are in there by team, not club.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostFPL/NPL is US Club like ECNL is US Club. I suggest instead of a second ECNL league there be a Premier League of clubs under FYSL/NYSL. College coaches could recruit better from 2 elite leagues.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostUmm, isn't that called the National League? Or did you think they should start another Premier League just so your club could sign up without actually earning your way in.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostIt is not the quantity, it is the quality. American style McDonalds.
ECNL can provide a good platform to showcase and compete against the best in games.
but games do not develop players.
Players are developed through standardized training curriculum.
If ECNL cannot enforce its own standards to its existing clubs, what is the point in expanding it?
You train so that when you do play games you do not have to think when you make a play, it comes naturally. Training, repeating technical movements and plays to make them a reaction, instead of a thought, is the purpose of training. Playing against "cones" will never deuplicate an opposing player no matter how quick you can dribble by that cone! Gamers as they are called, play at a level you will never see duirng training. These special players drive coaches nuts during training for their lack of effort, but always come through during games. The speed in which you train is not close to what a player will see during a game. The agressiveness during training will never match the intensity of a game. The pressure to win can never be duplicated during training.
And then you bash McDonalds which is the most successful corporation in the world! If every company were run like McDonalds then there would be a lot of very successful people in the world! You have amazed us all with your lack of knowledge for business and soccer! And to think you probably have kids! OMG!
- Quote
Comment
Comment